[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] lib/string_helpers: Add a few string helpers

[David Laight]

...
> Yeah, and I am sorry for bikeshedding. Honestly, I do not know what is
> better. This is why I do not want to block this series when others
> like this.
> 
> My main motivation is to point out that:
> 
>     enabledisable(enable)
> 
> might be, for some people, more eye bleeding than
> 
>     enable ? "enable" : "disable"

Indeed - you need to look the former up, wasting brain time.

> The problem is not that visible with yesno() and onoff(). But as you said,
> onoff() confliscts with variable names. And enabledisable() sucks.
> As a result, there is a non-trivial risk of two mass changes:
> 
> now:
> 
> - contition ? "yes" : "no"
> + yesno(condition)
> 
> a few moths later:
> 
> - yesno(condition)
> + str_yes_no(condition)

Followed by:
- str_yes_no(x)
+ no_yes_str(x)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)