[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Fix plane relative_data_rate calculation
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 27 08:50:59 UTC 2022
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:21:06AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:23:42AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > We are currently computing the relative data rates as
> > src_size * scale_factor where scale_factor is src_size / dst_size.
> > Thus relative data rate is src_size * src_size / dst_size,
> > which is just utter nonsense. What we really seem to want is
> > just a reasonable estimate on how much data will be fetched
> > which is just src_size. So let's do that instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Omg, how could it stay like this all the time?
>
> I actually had similar question, but thought that there just might
> be again some magical/empirical heuristics behind this.
> Need to challenge more anything, which can't be explained with
> BSpec formulas or by common sense...
Yeah, I suspect it's just some kind of brain fart when writing the
spec. I think I filed an issues for it but nothing really happened
IIRC.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 63 ++-------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 9a9d4acb2988..e8fb56f288b4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -4373,55 +4373,6 @@ void skl_pipe_ddb_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, wakeref);
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Determines the downscale amount of a plane for the purposes of watermark calculations.
> > - * The bspec defines downscale amount as:
> > - *
> > - * """
> > - * Horizontal down scale amount = maximum[1, Horizontal source size /
> > - * Horizontal destination size]
> > - * Vertical down scale amount = maximum[1, Vertical source size /
> > - * Vertical destination size]
> > - * Total down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
> > - * Vertical down scale amount
> > - * """
> > - *
> > - * Return value is provided in 16.16 fixed point form to retain fractional part.
> > - * Caller should take care of dividing & rounding off the value.
> > - */
> > -static uint_fixed_16_16_t
> > -skl_plane_downscale_amount(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> > -{
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> > - u32 src_w, src_h, dst_w, dst_h;
> > - uint_fixed_16_16_t fp_w_ratio, fp_h_ratio;
> > - uint_fixed_16_16_t downscale_h, downscale_w;
> > -
> > - if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> > - !intel_wm_plane_visible(crtc_state, plane_state)))
> > - return u32_to_fixed16(0);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
> > - * the 90/270 degree plane rotation cases (to match the
> > - * GTT mapping), hence no need to account for rotation here.
> > - *
> > - * n.b., src is 16.16 fixed point, dst is whole integer.
> > - */
> > - src_w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 16;
> > - src_h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 16;
> > - dst_w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
> > - dst_h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
> > -
> > - fp_w_ratio = div_fixed16(src_w, dst_w);
> > - fp_h_ratio = div_fixed16(src_h, dst_h);
> > - downscale_w = max_fixed16(fp_w_ratio, u32_to_fixed16(1));
> > - downscale_h = max_fixed16(fp_h_ratio, u32_to_fixed16(1));
> > -
> > - return mul_fixed16(downscale_w, downscale_h);
> > -}
> > -
> > struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry {
> > u8 active_pipes;
> > u8 dbuf_mask[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> > @@ -4932,10 +4883,7 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > {
> > struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
> > const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> > - u32 data_rate;
> > - u32 width = 0, height = 0;
> > - uint_fixed_16_16_t down_scale_amount;
> > - u64 rate;
> > + int width, height;
> >
> > if (!plane_state->uapi.visible)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -4961,14 +4909,7 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > height /= 2;
> > }
> >
> > - data_rate = width * height;
> > -
> > - down_scale_amount = skl_plane_downscale_amount(crtc_state, plane_state);
> > -
> > - rate = mul_round_up_u32_fixed16(data_rate, down_scale_amount);
> > -
> > - rate *= fb->format->cpp[color_plane];
> > - return rate;
> > + return width * height * fb->format->cpp[color_plane];
> > }
> >
> > static u64
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list