[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Second round of i915_reg.h splitting (rev3)

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Op 28-01-2022 om 16:49 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin:
>
>
> On 28/01/2022 15:21, Matt Roper wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:44:17AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
>>> == Series Details ==
>>>
>>> Series: Second round of i915_reg.h splitting (rev3)
>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99079/
>>> State : failure
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>>
>>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11154_full -> Patchwork_22133_full
>>> ====================================================
>>>
>>> Summary
>>> -------
>>>
>>>    **FAILURE**
>>>
>>>    Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22133_full absolutely need to be
>>>    verified manually.
>>>       If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>>>    introduced in Patchwork_22133_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
>>>    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>>>
>>>   
>>> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>    No changes in participating hosts
>>>
>>> Possible new issues
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>>    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22133_full:
>>>
>>> ### IGT changes ###
>>>
>>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>>
>>>    * igt at gem_softpin@softpin:
>>>      - shard-snb:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>>>     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11154/shard-snb5/igt@gem_softpin@softpin.html
>>>     [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22133/shard-snb6/igt@gem_softpin@softpin.html
>>
>> It's not really clear what the error was here, but it happened during
>> GTT reservation for an execbuf operation.  That doesn't seem like
>> anything that could be related to the register definition shuffling in
>> this series.
>
> Yes, does not look like your problem.
>
> Ungrab_vma() points to Maarten, any idea on this oops?:
>
> <6> [54.564958] [IGT] gem_softpin: starting subtest softpin
> <4> [61.713735] stack segment: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> <4> [61.713746] CPU: 0 PID: 1363 Comm: gem_softpin Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-CI-Patchwork_22133+ #1
> <4> [61.713753] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 8300  /0Y2MRG, BIOS A06 10/17/2011
> <4> [61.713759] RIP: 0010:ungrab_vma+0x9/0x80 [i915]
> <4> [61.713909] Code: ef e8 4b 5c de e0 e8 16 90 e5 e0 8b 83 38 99 00 00 85 c0 75 e1 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 e9 4c ef 14 00 55 53 48 8b af c0 00 00 00 <8b> 45 00 85 c0 75 03 5b 5d c3 48 8b 85 a0 02 00 00 48 89 fb 48 8b
> <4> [61.713920] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000a8f880 EFLAGS: 00010246
> <4> [61.713926] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc90000a8f598 RCX: 0000000000000000
> <4> [61.713931] RDX: ffff88812ef1b270 RSI: ffff8881053e0880 RDI: ffff88813d6c2d40
> <4> [61.713936] RBP: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R08: ffff88812ef1b270 R09: ffff88812ef1b2c0
> <4> [61.713940] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88812ef180b0 R12: ffff88813d6c2d40
> <4> [61.713945] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88812ef18040 R15: ffff88813d6c3058
> <4> [61.713950] FS:  00007f6158f37c00(0000) GS:ffff888227600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> <4> [61.713956] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> <4> [61.713961] CR2: 000055de05dcc028 CR3: 000000010eb1a004 CR4: 00000000000606f0
> <4> [61.713966] Call Trace:
> <4> [61.713968]  <TASK>
> <4> [61.713971]  i915_gem_evict_for_node+0x329/0x3b0 [i915]
> <4> [61.714088]  i915_gem_gtt_reserve+0x106/0x130 [i915]
> <4> [61.714202]  i915_vma_pin_ww+0x8a6/0xb00 [i915]
> <4> [61.714324]  eb_validate_vmas+0x688/0x860 [i915]
> <4> [61.714440]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbfe/0x2530 [i915]
> <4> [61.714549]  ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
> <4> [61.714559]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5e6/0x2580
> <4> [61.714565]  ? coalesce_file_region+0x181/0x230
> <4> [61.714574]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x116/0x2c0 [i915]
> <4> [61.714681]  ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x2530/0x2530 [i915]
> <4> [61.714791]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xae/0x140
> <4> [61.714797]  drm_ioctl+0x201/0x3d0
> <4> [61.714802]  ? i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x2530/0x2530 [i915]
> <4> [61.714910]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xa0
> <4> [61.714916]  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0xb0
> <4> [61.714921]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko 

This might help:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99418/