[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/39] drm/i915: display: fix kernel-doc markup warnings

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There are a couple of issues at i915 display kernel-doc markups:
> 
> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c:2238: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_connector' not described in 'intel_connector_debugfs_add'
> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c:2238: warning: Excess function parameter 'connector' description in 'intel_connector_debugfs_add'
> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:700: warning: expecting prototype for intel_display_power_put_async(). Prototype was for __intel_display_power_put_async() instead
> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:807: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work'
> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c:807: warning: Excess function parameter 'dig_port' description in 'intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work'
> 
> Those are due to wrong parameter of function name. Address them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
> See [PATCH v2 00/39] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657699522.git.mchehab@kernel.org/
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c              | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 6c3954479047..1e35eb01742b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_current_bpc);
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_connector_debugfs_add - add i915 specific connector debugfs files
> - * @connector: pointer to a registered drm_connector
> + * @intel_connector: pointer to a registered drm_connector
>   *
>   * Cleanup will be done by drm_connector_unregister() through a call to
>   * drm_debugfs_connector_remove().
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 589af257edeb..fd6b71160a06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ intel_display_power_put_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * intel_display_power_put_async - release a power domain reference asynchronously
> + * __intel_display_power_put_async - release a power domain reference asynchronously

oh, we are really using __ prefix for non-static functions?! o.O

anyway, with that ditto "()" consistency,

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>



>   * @i915: i915 device instance
>   * @domain: power domain to reference
>   * @wakeref: wakeref acquired for the reference that is being released
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> index 6773840f6cc7..7ce0cbe0de05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_lock(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_tc_port_disconnect_phy_work: disconnect TypeC PHY from display port
> - * @dig_port: digital port
> + * @work: workqueue struct
>   *
>   * Disconnect the given digital port from its TypeC PHY (handing back the
>   * control of the PHY to the TypeC subsystem). This will happen in a delayed
> -- 
> 2.36.1
>