[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

[Dave Airlie]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:55, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:44:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:05:45 +0200 Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 11.07.22 um 04:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> > > >
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> > > >
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> > > >
> > > > between commit:
> > > >
> > > >    925b6e59138c ("Revert "drm/amdgpu: add drm buddy support to amdgpu"")
> > > >
> > > > from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
> > > >
> > > >    5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")
> > > >
> > > > from the drm tree.
> > > >
> > > > This is a mess :-(  I have just reverted the above revert before mergin
> > > > the drm tree for today, please fix it up.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the noise, the patch "5e3f1e7729ec ("drm/amdgpu: fix start
> > > calculation in amdgpu_vram_mgr_new")" and another one is going to be
> > > reverted from the drm tree as well.
> > >
> > > It's just that -fixes patches where faster than -next patches.
> >
> > Here we are a week later, -rc7 has been released and as far as I can
> > tell (though I may have missed it), this is still a problem :-(
> >
> > I am still reverting 925b6e59138c (which is now in Linus' tree).
>
> Ping?

My assumption is I fix this on sending my -next tree to Linus with a
resolution I create at that time?

Is there another option, we have this fixed in out drm-tip tree already.

Dave.