[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 01/13] drm/edid: add block count and data helper functions for drm_edid
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 2 16:54:59 UTC 2022
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:39:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add drm_edid based block count and data access helper functions that
> take the EDID allocated size into account.
>
> At the moment, the allocated size should always match the EDID size
> indicated by the extension count, but this will change in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 929fc0e46751..682d954a9e42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -1613,6 +1613,35 @@ static const void *edid_extension_block_data(const struct edid *edid, int index)
> return edid_block_data(edid, index + 1);
> }
>
> +static int drm_edid_block_count(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid)
> +{
> + int num_blocks;
> +
> + /* Starting point */
> + num_blocks = edid_block_count(drm_edid->edid);
> +
> + /* Limit by allocated size */
> + num_blocks = min(num_blocks, (int)drm_edid->size / EDID_LENGTH);
Hmm. Is there a particular reason we couldn't just always
return drm_edid->size/EDID_LENGTH here? That is, why would we not
set drm_edid->size to always reflect the actual size of the EDID?
> +
> + return num_blocks;
> +}
> +
> +static int drm_edid_extension_block_count(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid)
> +{
> + return drm_edid_block_count(drm_edid) - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static const void *drm_edid_block_data(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid, int index)
> +{
> + return edid_block_data(drm_edid->edid, index);
> +}
> +
> +static const void *drm_edid_extension_block_data(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid,
> + int index)
> +{
> + return edid_extension_block_data(drm_edid->edid, index);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initializer helper for legacy interfaces, where we have no choice but to
> * trust edid size. Not for general purpose use.
> @@ -1665,8 +1694,8 @@ static const void *__drm_edid_iter_next(struct drm_edid_iter *iter)
> if (!iter->drm_edid)
> return NULL;
>
> - if (iter->index < edid_block_count(iter->drm_edid->edid))
> - block = edid_block_data(iter->drm_edid->edid, iter->index++);
> + if (iter->index < drm_edid_block_count(iter->drm_edid))
> + block = drm_edid_block_data(iter->drm_edid, iter->index++);
>
> return block;
> }
> @@ -3574,22 +3603,21 @@ static int add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> const u8 *drm_find_edid_extension(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid,
> int ext_id, int *ext_index)
> {
> - const struct edid *edid = drm_edid ? drm_edid->edid : NULL;
> const u8 *edid_ext = NULL;
> int i;
>
> /* No EDID or EDID extensions */
> - if (!edid || !edid_extension_block_count(edid))
> + if (!drm_edid || !drm_edid_extension_block_count(drm_edid))
> return NULL;
>
> /* Find CEA extension */
> - for (i = *ext_index; i < edid_extension_block_count(edid); i++) {
> - edid_ext = edid_extension_block_data(edid, i);
> + for (i = *ext_index; i < drm_edid_extension_block_count(drm_edid); i++) {
> + edid_ext = drm_edid_extension_block_data(drm_edid, i);
> if (edid_block_tag(edid_ext) == ext_id)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (i >= edid_extension_block_count(edid))
> + if (i >= drm_edid_extension_block_count(drm_edid))
> return NULL;
>
> *ext_index = i + 1;
> --
> 2.30.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list