[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Improve user experience and driver robustness under SIGINT or similar
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 7 08:36:17 UTC 2022
On 27/05/2022 13:07, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 27.05.2022 09:24, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> We have long standing customer complaints that pressing Ctrl-C (or to the
>> effect of) causes engine resets with otherwise well behaving programs.
>>
>> Not only is logging engine resets during normal operation not desirable
>> since it creates support incidents, but more fundamentally we should
>> avoid
>> going the engine reset path when we can since any engine reset introduces
>> a chance of harming an innocent context.
>>
>> Reason for this undesirable behaviour is that the driver currently does
>> not distinguish between banned contexts and non-persistent contexts which
>> have been closed.
>>
>> To fix this we add the distinction between the two reasons for revoking
>> contexts, which then allows the strict timeout only be applied to banned,
>> while innocent contexts (well behaving) can preempt cleanly and exit
>> without triggering the engine reset path.
>>
>> Note that the added context exiting category applies both to closed non-
>> persistent context, and any exiting context when hangcheck has been
>> disabled by the user.
>>
>> At the same time we rename the backend operation from 'ban' to 'revoke'
>> which more accurately describes the actual semantics. (There is no ban at
>> the backend level since banning is a concept driven by the scheduling
>> frontend. Backends are simply able to revoke a running context so that
>> is the more appropriate name chosen.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 23 +++++++++++------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h | 25 +++++++++++++------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 4 ++-
>> .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 6 ++---
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c | 7 +++---
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 15 ++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +-
>> 8 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
>> index ab4c5ab28e4d..6b171c89b1b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
>> @@ -1367,7 +1367,8 @@ static struct intel_engine_cs
>> *active_engine(struct intel_context *ce)
>> return engine;
>> }
>> -static void kill_engines(struct i915_gem_engines *engines, bool ban)
>> +static void
>> +kill_engines(struct i915_gem_engines *engines, bool exit, bool
>> persistent)
>> {
>> struct i915_gem_engines_iter it;
>> struct intel_context *ce;
>> @@ -1381,9 +1382,15 @@ static void kill_engines(struct
>> i915_gem_engines *engines, bool ban)
>> */
>> for_each_gem_engine(ce, engines, it) {
>> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> + bool skip = false;
>> - if (ban && intel_context_ban(ce, NULL))
>> - continue;
>> + if (exit)
>> + skip = intel_context_set_exiting(ce);
>> + else if (!persistent)
>> + skip = intel_context_exit_nonpersistent(ce, NULL);
>> +
>> + if (skip)
>> + continue; /* Already marked. */
>
> why not:
> if (exit && intel_context_set_exiting(ce))
> continue;
> else if (!persistent && intel_context_exit_nonpersistent(ce, NULL)
> continue;
Just so I can put the "already marked" comment on single line.
>
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
Thanks!
John, Daniel - you had reservations against the older version of this
patch AFAIR. This time round I believe I conceptually simplified it by
doing a clean separation of contexts which should not be scheduled any
more becuase they want it so, versus the ones we banned. That is, the
patch stops abusing the banned status for contexts which haven't been
(banned). This allows to only apply the strict preempt timeout to
banned, while there is no reason to add any new timeout values for the rest.
Any objections to this version?
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>> /*
>> * Check the current active state of this context; if we
>> @@ -1395,7 +1402,7 @@ static void kill_engines(struct i915_gem_engines
>> *engines, bool ban)
>> engine = active_engine(ce);
>> /* First attempt to gracefully cancel the context */
>> - if (engine && !__cancel_engine(engine) && ban)
>> + if (engine && !__cancel_engine(engine) && (exit || !persistent))
>> /*
>> * If we are unable to send a preemptive pulse to bump
>> * the context from the GPU, we have to resort to a full
>> @@ -1407,8 +1414,6 @@ static void kill_engines(struct i915_gem_engines
>> *engines, bool ban)
>> static void kill_context(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>> {
>> - bool ban = (!i915_gem_context_is_persistent(ctx) ||
>> - !ctx->i915->params.enable_hangcheck);
>> struct i915_gem_engines *pos, *next;
>> spin_lock_irq(&ctx->stale.lock);
>> @@ -1421,7 +1426,8 @@ static void kill_context(struct i915_gem_context
>> *ctx)
>> spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->stale.lock);
>> - kill_engines(pos, ban);
>> + kill_engines(pos, !ctx->i915->params.enable_hangcheck,
>> + i915_gem_context_is_persistent(ctx));
>> spin_lock_irq(&ctx->stale.lock);
>> GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sw_fence_signaled(&pos->fence));
>> @@ -1467,7 +1473,8 @@ static void engines_idle_release(struct
>> i915_gem_context *ctx,
>> kill:
>> if (list_empty(&engines->link)) /* raced, already closed */
>> - kill_engines(engines, true);
>> + kill_engines(engines, true,
>> + i915_gem_context_is_persistent(ctx));
>> i915_sw_fence_commit(&engines->fence);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> index 4070cb5711d8..654a092ed3d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> @@ -601,6 +601,30 @@ u64 intel_context_get_avg_runtime_ns(struct
>> intel_context *ce)
>> return avg;
>> }
>> +bool intel_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request
>> *rq)
>> +{
>> + bool ret = intel_context_set_banned(ce);
>> +
>> + trace_intel_context_ban(ce);
>> +
>> + if (ce->ops->revoke)
>> + ce->ops->revoke(ce, rq,
>> + INTEL_CONTEXT_BANNED_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool intel_context_exit_nonpersistent(struct intel_context *ce,
>> + struct i915_request *rq)
>> +{
>> + bool ret = intel_context_set_exiting(ce);
>> +
>> + if (ce->ops->revoke)
>> + ce->ops->revoke(ce, rq, ce->engine->props.preempt_timeout_ms);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
>> #include "selftest_context.c"
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> index b7d3214d2cdd..8e2d70630c49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>> ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>> } while (0)
>> +#define INTEL_CONTEXT_BANNED_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MS (1)
>> +
>> struct i915_gem_ww_ctx;
>> void intel_context_init(struct intel_context *ce,
>> @@ -309,18 +311,27 @@ static inline bool
>> intel_context_set_banned(struct intel_context *ce)
>> return test_and_set_bit(CONTEXT_BANNED, &ce->flags);
>> }
>> -static inline bool intel_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce,
>> - struct i915_request *rq)
>> +bool intel_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request
>> *rq);
>> +
>> +static inline bool intel_context_is_schedulable(const struct
>> intel_context *ce)
>> {
>> - bool ret = intel_context_set_banned(ce);
>> + return !test_bit(CONTEXT_EXITING, &ce->flags) &&
>> + !test_bit(CONTEXT_BANNED, &ce->flags);
>> +}
>> - trace_intel_context_ban(ce);
>> - if (ce->ops->ban)
>> - ce->ops->ban(ce, rq);
>> +static inline bool intel_context_is_exiting(const struct
>> intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + return test_bit(CONTEXT_EXITING, &ce->flags);
>> +}
>> - return ret;
>> +static inline bool intel_context_set_exiting(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + return test_and_set_bit(CONTEXT_EXITING, &ce->flags);
>> }
>> +bool intel_context_exit_nonpersistent(struct intel_context *ce,
>> + struct i915_request *rq);
>> +
>> static inline bool
>> intel_context_force_single_submission(const struct intel_context *ce)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> index 09f82545789f..d2d75d9c0c8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> @@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct intel_context_ops {
>> int (*alloc)(struct intel_context *ce);
>> - void (*ban)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq);
>> + void (*revoke)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq,
>> + unsigned int preempt_timeout_ms);
>> int (*pre_pin)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx
>> *ww, void **vaddr);
>> int (*pin)(struct intel_context *ce, void *vaddr);
>> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ struct intel_context {
>> #define CONTEXT_GUC_INIT 10
>> #define CONTEXT_PERMA_PIN 11
>> #define CONTEXT_IS_PARKING 12
>> +#define CONTEXT_EXITING 13
>> struct {
>> u64 timeout_us;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>> index a4510b5c0c3d..ad72e2c5c4e7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>> @@ -480,9 +480,9 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
>> if (unlikely(intel_context_is_closed(ce) &&
>> !intel_engine_has_heartbeat(engine)))
>> - intel_context_set_banned(ce);
>> + intel_context_set_exiting(ce);
>> - if (unlikely(intel_context_is_banned(ce) || bad_request(rq)))
>> + if (unlikely(!intel_context_is_schedulable(ce) || bad_request(rq)))
>> reset_active(rq, engine);
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
>> @@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static unsigned long
>> active_preempt_timeout(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>> /* Force a fast reset for terminated contexts (ignoring sysfs!) */
>> if (unlikely(intel_context_is_banned(rq->context) ||
>> bad_request(rq)))
>> - return 1;
>> + return INTEL_CONTEXT_BANNED_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MS;
>> return READ_ONCE(engine->props.preempt_timeout_ms);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
>> index f8f279a195c0..d5d6f1fadcae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c
>> @@ -598,8 +598,9 @@ static void ring_context_reset(struct
>> intel_context *ce)
>> clear_bit(CONTEXT_VALID_BIT, &ce->flags);
>> }
>> -static void ring_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce,
>> - struct i915_request *rq)
>> +static void ring_context_revoke(struct intel_context *ce,
>> + struct i915_request *rq,
>> + unsigned int preempt_timeout_ms)
>> {
>> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>> @@ -634,7 +635,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops
>> ring_context_ops = {
>> .cancel_request = ring_context_cancel_request,
>> - .ban = ring_context_ban,
>> + .revoke = ring_context_revoke,
>> .pre_pin = ring_context_pre_pin,
>> .pin = ring_context_pin,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> index 5a1dfacf24ea..e62ea35513ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -2790,7 +2790,9 @@ static void
>> __guc_context_set_preemption_timeout(struct intel_guc *guc,
>> __guc_context_set_context_policies(guc, &policy, true);
>> }
>> -static void guc_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce, struct
>> i915_request *rq)
>> +static void
>> +guc_context_revoke(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq,
>> + unsigned int preempt_timeout_ms)
>> {
>> struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
>> struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm =
>> @@ -2829,7 +2831,8 @@ static void guc_context_ban(struct intel_context
>> *ce, struct i915_request *rq)
>> * gets kicked off the HW ASAP.
>> */
>> with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref) {
>> - __guc_context_set_preemption_timeout(guc, guc_id, 1);
>> + __guc_context_set_preemption_timeout(guc, guc_id,
>> + preempt_timeout_ms);
>> __guc_context_sched_disable(guc, ce, guc_id);
>> }
>> } else {
>> @@ -2837,7 +2840,7 @@ static void guc_context_ban(struct intel_context
>> *ce, struct i915_request *rq)
>> with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
>> __guc_context_set_preemption_timeout(guc,
>> ce->guc_id.id,
>> - 1);
>> + preempt_timeout_ms);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -3190,7 +3193,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops
>> guc_context_ops = {
>> .unpin = guc_context_unpin,
>> .post_unpin = guc_context_post_unpin,
>> - .ban = guc_context_ban,
>> + .revoke = guc_context_revoke,
>> .cancel_request = guc_context_cancel_request,
>> @@ -3439,7 +3442,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops
>> virtual_guc_context_ops = {
>> .unpin = guc_virtual_context_unpin,
>> .post_unpin = guc_context_post_unpin,
>> - .ban = guc_context_ban,
>> + .revoke = guc_context_revoke,
>> .cancel_request = guc_context_cancel_request,
>> @@ -3528,7 +3531,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops
>> virtual_parent_context_ops = {
>> .unpin = guc_parent_context_unpin,
>> .post_unpin = guc_context_post_unpin,
>> - .ban = guc_context_ban,
>> + .revoke = guc_context_revoke,
>> .cancel_request = guc_context_cancel_request,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> index 73d5195146b0..c3937640b119 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
>> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ bool __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request
>> *request)
>> goto active;
>> }
>> - if (unlikely(intel_context_is_banned(request->context)))
>> + if (unlikely(!intel_context_is_schedulable(request->context)))
>> i915_request_set_error_once(request, -EIO);
>> if (unlikely(fatal_error(request->fence.error)))
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list