[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/dg2: Bump up CDCLK for DG2

[Stanislav Lisovskiy]

We seem to need this W/A same way as for TGL, in order
to fix some of the underruns, which we currently have and
those not related to PSR.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index 6e80162632dd..86a22c3766e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		min_cdclk = max(min_cdclk, (int)crtc_state->pixel_rate);
 
 	/*
-	 * HACK. Currently for TGL platforms we calculate
+	 * HACK. Currently for TGL/DG2 platforms we calculate
 	 * min_cdclk initially based on pixel_rate divided
 	 * by 2, accounting for also plane requirements,
 	 * however in some cases the lowest possible CDCLK
@@ -2308,7 +2308,7 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	 * Explicitly stating here that this seems to be currently
 	 * rather a Hack, than final solution.
 	 */
-	if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) {
+	if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
 		/*
 		 * Clamp to max_cdclk_freq in case pixel rate is higher,
 		 * in order not to break an 8K, but still leave W/A at place.
-- 
2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5