[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2_NB_MBD subplatform
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 16 14:47:07 UTC 2022
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 16/06/2022 15:15, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 16/06/2022 13:01, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
>>>> DG2 NB SKU need to distinguish between MBD and AIC to probe
>>>> the VRAM Self Refresh feature support. Adding those sub platform
>>>> accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 11 +++++++----
>>>> include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> index a5bc6a774c5a..f1f8699eedfd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> @@ -1007,10 +1007,13 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>>> #define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_PONTEVECCHIO)
>>>>
>>>> #define IS_DG2_G10(dev_priv) \
>>>> + IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD) || \
>>>> IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10)
>>>> #define IS_DG2_G11(dev_priv) \
>>>> + IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD) || \
>>>> IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11)
>>>> #define IS_DG2_G12(dev_priv) \
>>>> + IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD) || \
>>>> IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)
>>>> #define IS_ADLS_RPLS(dev_priv) \
>>>> IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>>> index f0bf23726ed8..93da555adc4e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>>>> @@ -187,6 +187,18 @@ static const u16 subplatform_rpl_ids[] = {
>>>> INTEL_RPLP_IDS(0),
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static const u16 subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const u16 subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const u16 subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids[] = {
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static const u16 subplatform_g10_ids[] = {
>>>> INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(0),
>>>> INTEL_ATS_M150_IDS(0),
>>>> @@ -246,6 +258,15 @@ void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>> } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_rpl_ids,
>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_rpl_ids))) {
>>>> mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL);
>>>> + } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids,
>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>>>> + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD);
>>>> + } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids,
>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>>>> + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD);
>>>> + } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids,
>>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_mb_mbd_ids))) {
>>>> + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD);
>>>> } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids,
>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids))) {
>>>> mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>>> index 08341174ee0a..c929e2d7e59c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>>>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ enum intel_platform {
>>>> * it is fine for the same bit to be used on multiple parent platforms.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (3)
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (6)
>>>> #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK (BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1)
>>>>
>>>> /* HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL */
>>>> @@ -111,9 +111,12 @@ enum intel_platform {
>>>> #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_UY (0)
>>>>
>>>> /* DG2 */
>>>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10 0
>>>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11 1
>>>> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12 2
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10_NB_MBD 0
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11_NB_MBD 1
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12_NB_MBD 2
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10 3
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11 4
>>>> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12 5
>>>
>>> Ugh I feel this "breaks" the subplatform idea.. feels like it is just
>>> too many bits when two separate sets of information get tracked (Gxx
>>> plus MBD).
>>
>> I think they could be specified independent of each other, though. The
>> subplatform if-else ladder would have to be replaced with independent
>> ifs. You'd have the G10/G11/G12 and 1 bit separately for MBD.
>>
>> Only the macros for PCI IDs need to be separate (MBD vs not). You'll
>> then have:
>>
>> static const u16 subplatform_g10_ids[] = {
>> INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(0),
>> INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> INTEL_ATS_M150_IDS(0),
>> };
>>
>> Ditto for g11 and g12, and separately:
>>
>> static const u16 subplatform_mbd_ids[] = {
>> INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(0),
>> };
>>
>> The IS_DG2_G10() etc. macros would remain unchanged. IS_DG2_MBD() would
>> only be IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MBD).
>>
>> Main point is, a platform could belong to multiple independent
>> subplatforms.
>>
>> Unless I'm missing something. ;)
>>
>>> How about a separate "is_mbd" flag in runtime_info? You can split the
>>> PCI IDs split as you have done, but do a search against the MBD ones and
>>> set the flag.
>>
>> What I dislike about this is that it's really not *runtime* info in any
>> sense, and it adds another way to define platform features. And we
>> already have too many.
>
> I was reluctant to suggest extending usage of subplatform bits in this
> way but it would be acceptable. My reservation/uncertainty was whether
> MBP is a "proper" subplatform. I see it's separate PCI IDs and even
> separate HW features, as seen in this series, but wasn't sure. Anyway,
> your proposal works for me. Better 4 bits than 6 so as much as possible
> remain for platform bits.
The alternative is separate struct intel_device_info with a static
is_mbd flag. But the duplication there is also getting out of hands. C
is really crap at this.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tvrtko
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /* ADL */
>>>> #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL 0
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>>> index 4585fed4e41e..198be417bb2d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/i915_pciids.h
>>>> @@ -693,32 +693,41 @@
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0xA7A9, info)
>>>>
>>>> /* DG2 */
>>>> -#define INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info) \
>>>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5690, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5691, info), \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5692, info), \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5692, info)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5693, info), \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5694, info), \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5695, info)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(info) \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5696, info), \
>>>> + INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5697, info)
>>>> +
>>>> +#define INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info) \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A0, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A1, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A2, info)
>>>>
>>>> #define INTEL_DG2_G11_IDS(info) \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5693, info), \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5694, info), \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5695, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A5, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A6, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B0, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B1, info)
>>>>
>>>> #define INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(info) \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5696, info), \
>>>> - INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x5697, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A3, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56A4, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B2, info), \
>>>> INTEL_VGA_DEVICE(0x56B3, info)
>>>>
>>>> #define INTEL_DG2_IDS(info) \
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G10_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G11_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>>>> + INTEL_DG2_G12_NB_MBD_IDS(info), \
>>>> INTEL_DG2_G10_IDS(info), \
>>>> INTEL_DG2_G11_IDS(info), \
>>>> INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(info)
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list