[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove __dma_fence_is_chain()

[Christian König]

Am 29.06.22 um 01:35 schrieb Rob Clark:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org>
>
> drive-by cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org>

We should probably completely remove that dependency and rather use 
dma_fence_unwrap instead.

But that's probably for another patch Reviewed-by: Christian König 
<christian.koenig at amd.com>.

Christian.


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> index 319936f91ac5..667841780514 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> @@ -73,11 +73,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
>   	rcu_read_unlock();
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
> -{
> -	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
> -}
> -
>   void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
>   				  const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
>   {
> @@ -93,7 +88,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
>   
>   		for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
>   			fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
> -	} else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
> +	} else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
>   		struct dma_fence *iter;
>   
>   		/* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */