[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Nuke PCH_JSP

Murthy, Arun R arun.r.murthy at intel.com
Thu Jun 30 15:55:57 UTC 2022



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 8:36 PM
> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Nuke PCH_JSP
> 
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> JSP is based on ICP and we don't really need to differentiate between the
> two. So let's just delcare JSP to be ICP.
> 
> The only slight change here is for Wa_14011294188 which we used to apply
> for JSP but now we'll only apply to MCC. This should be fine since the issue
> being dealt with was introduced in TGP and inherited into MCC. JSP being
> derived from ICP should not need this workaround.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c                   | 3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h                   | 4 +---
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index a9cb27f1c964..589af257edeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
> 
>  	/* Wa_14011294188:ehl,jsl,tgl,rkl,adl-s */
> -	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_JSP &&
> +	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_TGP &&
>  	    INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) < PCH_DG1)
>  		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D, 0,
>  			     PCH_DPMGUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE); diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> index b45c504c6f03..0fec25be146a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ intel_pch_type(const struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv, unsigned short id)
>  	case INTEL_PCH_JSP_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Found Jasper Lake PCH\n");
>  		drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv));
> -		return PCH_JSP;
> +		/* JSP is ICP compatible */
> +		return PCH_ICP;
>  	case INTEL_PCH_ADP_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
>  	case INTEL_PCH_ADP2_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
>  	case INTEL_PCH_ADP3_DEVICE_ID_TYPE:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> index 07f6f5517968..7c8ce9781d1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h
> @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ enum intel_pch {
>  	PCH_LPT,	/* Lynxpoint/Wildcatpoint PCH */
>  	PCH_SPT,        /* Sunrisepoint/Kaby Lake PCH */
>  	PCH_CNP,        /* Cannon/Comet Lake PCH */
> -	PCH_ICP,	/* Ice Lake PCH */
> -	PCH_JSP,	/* Jasper Lake PCH */
> +	PCH_ICP,	/* Ice Lake/Jasper Lake PCH */

Only in i915_irq icp is used and in the rest of the i915 code icl is used leading to confusion.
I would rather suggest to use ICL since most of the driver references it as icl and also change icp in i915_irq to icl.
This is just my opinion, other can comment over here.

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list