[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Store the m2 divider as a whole in bxt_clk_div

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 01 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Get rid of the pointless m2 int vs. frac split in bxt_clk_div
> and just store the whole divider as one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 33 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 899aa42a858f..4a82e630cbec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2085,8 +2085,7 @@ struct bxt_clk_div {
>  	int clock;
>  	u32 p1;
>  	u32 p2;
> -	u32 m2_int;
> -	u32 m2_frac;
> +	u32 m2;
>  	u32 n;
>  
>  	int vco;
> @@ -2094,13 +2093,20 @@ struct bxt_clk_div {
>  
>  /* pre-calculated values for DP linkrates */
>  static const struct bxt_clk_div bxt_dp_clk_val[] = {
> -	{ .clock = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 27, .m2_frac =       0, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 27, .m2_frac =       0, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 24, .m2_frac = 1258291, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> -	{ .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .m2_int = 32, .m2_frac = 1677722, .n = 1, },
> +	{ .clock = 162000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 270000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac =       0 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 540000, .p1 = 2, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x6c00000 /* .m2_int = 27, m2_frac =       0 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 216000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 2, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 243000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x6133333 /* .m2_int = 24, m2_frac = 1258291 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 324000, .p1 = 4, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },
> +	{ .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .n = 1,
> +	  .m2 = 0x819999a /* .m2_int = 32, m2_frac = 1677722 */ },

Mmh, I guess here I would've added some macros to construct m2 from
m2_int and m2_frac.

#define M2_INT_SHIFT	22
#define M2_FRAC_MASK	0x3fffff

#define M2(int, frac) ((int) << M2_INT_SHIFT) | (frac))

And you get this:

	{ .clock = 432000, .p1 = 3, .p2 = 1, .m2 = M2(32, 1677722), .n = 1, },

No need to retain the int/frac in comments. Can also use
REG_FIELD_PREP/GET if you want to over-engineer...

>  };
>  
>  static bool
> @@ -2127,8 +2133,7 @@ bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	clk_div->p2 = best_clock.p2;
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, best_clock.m1 != 2);
>  	clk_div->n = best_clock.n;
> -	clk_div->m2_int = best_clock.m2 >> 22;
> -	clk_div->m2_frac = best_clock.m2 & ((1 << 22) - 1);
> +	clk_div->m2 = best_clock.m2;
>  
>  	clk_div->vco = best_clock.vco;
>  
> @@ -2197,11 +2202,11 @@ static bool bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		lanestagger = 0x02;
>  
>  	dpll_hw_state->ebb0 = PORT_PLL_P1(clk_div->p1) | PORT_PLL_P2(clk_div->p2);
> -	dpll_hw_state->pll0 = clk_div->m2_int;
> +	dpll_hw_state->pll0 = clk_div->m2 >> 22;
>  	dpll_hw_state->pll1 = PORT_PLL_N(clk_div->n);
> -	dpll_hw_state->pll2 = clk_div->m2_frac;
> +	dpll_hw_state->pll2 = clk_div->m2 & 0x3fffff;
>  
> -	if (clk_div->m2_frac)
> +	if (clk_div->m2 & 0x3fffff)
>  		dpll_hw_state->pll3 = PORT_PLL_M2_FRAC_ENABLE;

Also could reuse the shift and mask macros here.

Other than that, the direction seems good.

BR,
Jani.


>  
>  	dpll_hw_state->pll6 = prop_coef | PORT_PLL_INT_COEFF(int_coef);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center