[Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] GVT next changes for drm-intel-next

[Wang, Zhi A]

Which suits better for you? For me, I am OK with both. If you are not in a rush of closing the window, I can submit through drm-intel-next-fixes.

Thanks,
Zhi.

On 3/8/22 9:56 AM, Nikula, Jani wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2022, "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang at intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> Here is a new pull request of gvt-next. It contains a small patch to add the missing
>> mdev attribute name, which will be used by the middleware, like kubevirt.
> 
> I'm wondering if I should pull this to drm-intel-next, which is already
> targeting v5.19, or if it should be pulled to drm-intel-next-fixes
> targeting v5.18. It does look like a fix.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
>>
>> This pull has been tested by:
>>
>> $ dim apply-pull drm-intel-next < this_email.eml
>>
>> The following changes since commit 30424ebae8df0f786835e7a31ad790fa00764f35:
>>
>>   Merge tag 'drm-intel-gt-next-2022-02-17' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-intel-next (2022-02-23 15:03:51 -0500)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>   https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux tags/gvt-next-2022-03-07
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 43d26c4fc6c446d766253d546f0083d78023d34a:
>>
>>   drm/i915/gvt: add the missing mdev attribute "name" (2022-03-07 12:21:58 -0500)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> - add the missing attribute "name" in VFIO mdev hierarchy.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Zhi Wang (1):
>>       drm/i915/gvt: add the missing mdev attribute "name"
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>