[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915: Fix DBUF bandwidth vs. cdclk handling
Lisovskiy, Stanislav
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Thu Mar 10 08:22:56 UTC 2022
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Make the dbuf bandwidth min cdclk calculations match the spec
> more closely. Supposedly the arbiter can only guarantee an equal
> share of the total bandwidth of the slice to each active plane
> on that slice.
So are we assuming or really know this? May be we should ask
Arthur(or may be you did already) because could be it works
somehow differently yet again.
> So we take the max bandwidth of any of the planes
> on each slice and multiply that by the number of active planes
> on the slice to get a worst case estimate on how much bandwidth
> we require.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 159 +++++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 67 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 56eebccd16e2..ed86f3e3c66c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -692,12 +692,34 @@ static bool intel_bw_state_changed(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice) {
> - if (old_crtc_bw->used_bw[slice] != new_crtc_bw->used_bw[slice])
> + if (old_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] != new_crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] ||
> + old_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] != new_crtc_bw->active_planes[slice])
> return true;
> }
> }
>
> - return old_bw_state->min_cdclk != new_bw_state->min_cdclk;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + enum plane_id plane_id,
> + const struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb,
> + unsigned int data_rate)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> + unsigned int dbuf_mask = skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(i915, ddb);
> + enum dbuf_slice slice;
> +
> + /*
> + * The arbiter can only really guarantee an
> + * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> + */
> + for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(i915, slice, dbuf_mask) {
> + crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], data_rate);
So does the crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] not store plane data rate which consumes
the most, I guess? Wondering should we name it bit somewhat differently.
Like max_plane_bw or smth, because crtc_bw->max_bw[slice] sounds more like
total bw consumed by slice, but not plane.
> + crtc_bw->active_planes[slice] |= BIT(plane_id);
> + }
> }
>
> static void skl_crtc_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> @@ -708,46 +730,77 @@ static void skl_crtc_calc_dbuf_bw(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[crtc->pipe];
> enum plane_id plane_id;
>
> - memset(&crtc_bw->used_bw, 0, sizeof(crtc_bw->used_bw));
> + memset(crtc_bw, 0, sizeof(*crtc_bw));
>
> if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
>
> for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> - const struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb =
> - &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb[plane_id];
> - unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id];
> - unsigned int dbuf_mask = skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(i915, ddb);
> - enum dbuf_slice slice;
> -
> - for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(i915, slice, dbuf_mask)
> - crtc_bw->used_bw[slice] += data_rate;
> + /*
> + * We assume cursors are small enough
> + * to not cause bandwidth problems.
> + */
> + if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
> + continue;
> +
> + skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(bw_state, crtc, plane_id,
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb[plane_id],
> + crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id]);
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11)
> + skl_plane_calc_dbuf_bw(bw_state, crtc, plane_id,
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id],
> + crtc_state->data_rate[plane_id]);
> }
> +}
> +
> +/* "Maximum Data Buffer Bandwidth" */
> +static int
> +intel_bw_dbuf_min_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> +{
> + unsigned int total_max_bw = 0;
> + enum dbuf_slice slice;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> - return;
> + for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice) {
> + int num_active_planes = 0;
> + unsigned int max_bw = 0;
> + enum pipe pipe;
>
> - for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> - const struct skl_ddb_entry *ddb =
> - &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
> - unsigned int data_rate = crtc_state->data_rate_y[plane_id];
> - unsigned int dbuf_mask = skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(i915, ddb);
> - enum dbuf_slice slice;
> + /*
> + * The arbiter can only really guarantee an
> + * equal share of the total bw to each plane.
> + */
> + for_each_pipe(i915, pipe) {
> + const struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw = &bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
>
> - for_each_dbuf_slice_in_mask(i915, slice, dbuf_mask)
> - crtc_bw->used_bw[slice] += data_rate;
> + max_bw = max(crtc_bw->max_bw[slice], max_bw);
> + num_active_planes += hweight8(crtc_bw->active_planes[slice]);
> + }
> + max_bw *= num_active_planes;
So we are now putting much more strict limitation here. I.e assuming that if there are
lets say planes 1,2,3. Plane 1 consumes 3000, Plane 2 consumes 1000, Plane 3 consumes 1000.
All together they consume 5000 so we kinda derive CDCLK from there(i.e 5000/64)
This is basically what formula also says in the BSpec, i.e it just instruct us
to add all those planes and check that we don't exceed CDCLK * 64 in total.
However now we are going to take plane 1, since it consumes the most and multiply that 3000
by 3, i.e get 9000 instead of 5000, which would result in a way higher CDCLK.
I think you got this assumption from that place in BSpec:
DBUF maximum plane bandwidth MB/s = DBUF maximum pipe bandwidth / number of enabled planes
In fact sounds just about right, would be probably still nice to clarify that from HW
team. I remember we even discussed that long time back in the office days.
Stan
> +
> + total_max_bw = max(total_max_bw, max_bw);
> }
> +
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(total_max_bw, 64);
> +}
> +
> +int intel_bw_min_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)
> +{
> + return intel_bw_dbuf_min_cdclk(i915, bw_state);
> }
>
> -int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + bool *need_cdclk_calc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> - struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> + const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> + const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state;
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> + int old_min_cdclk, new_min_cdclk;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> - int max_bw = 0;
> - enum pipe pipe;
> int i;
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> @@ -766,34 +819,46 @@ int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (!old_bw_state)
> return 0;
>
> - for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> - struct intel_dbuf_bw *crtc_bw;
> - enum dbuf_slice slice;
> -
> - crtc_bw = &new_bw_state->dbuf_bw[pipe];
> -
> - for_each_dbuf_slice(dev_priv, slice) {
> - /*
> - * Current experimental observations show that contrary
> - * to BSpec we get underruns once we exceed 64 * CDCLK
> - * for slices in total.
> - * As a temporary measure in order not to keep CDCLK
> - * bumped up all the time we calculate CDCLK according
> - * to this formula for overall bw consumed by slices.
> - */
> - max_bw += crtc_bw->used_bw[slice];
> - }
> - }
> -
> - new_bw_state->min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_bw, 64);
> -
> if (intel_bw_state_changed(dev_priv, old_bw_state, new_bw_state)) {
> int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> -
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + old_min_cdclk = intel_bw_min_cdclk(dev_priv, old_bw_state);
> + new_min_cdclk = intel_bw_min_cdclk(dev_priv, new_bw_state);
> +
> + /*
> + * No need to check against the cdclk state if
> + * the min cdclk for the dbuf doesn't increase.
> + *
> + * Ie. we only ever increase the cdclk due to dbuf
> + * requirements. This can reduce back and forth
> + * display blinking due to constant cdclk changes.
> + */
> + if (new_min_cdclk <= old_min_cdclk)
> + return 0;
> +
> + cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(state);
> + if (IS_ERR(cdclk_state))
> + return PTR_ERR(cdclk_state);
> +
> + /*
> + * No need to recalculate the cdclk state if
> + * the min cdclk for the dbuf doesn't increase.
> + *
> + * Ie. we only ever increase the cdclk due to dbuf
> + * requirements. This can reduce back and forth
> + * display blinking due to constant cdclk changes.
> + */
> + if (new_min_cdclk <= cdclk_state->bw_min_cdclk)
> + return 0;
> +
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "new bandwidth min cdclk (%d kHz) > old min cdclk (%d kHz)\n",
> + new_min_cdclk, cdclk_state->bw_min_cdclk);
> + *need_cdclk_calc = true;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> index 6acdf1245b3a..92fc09a8c824 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
>
> struct intel_dbuf_bw {
> - int used_bw[I915_MAX_DBUF_SLICES];
> + unsigned int max_bw[I915_MAX_DBUF_SLICES];
> + u8 active_planes[I915_MAX_DBUF_SLICES];
> };
>
> struct intel_bw_state {
> @@ -42,8 +43,6 @@ struct intel_bw_state {
>
> unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> -
> - int min_cdclk;
> };
>
> #define to_intel_bw_state(x) container_of((x), struct intel_bw_state, base)
> @@ -64,6 +63,9 @@ void intel_bw_crtc_update(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> int icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> u32 points_mask);
> -int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + bool *need_cdclk_calc);
> +int intel_bw_min_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_BW_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 5d0c2f8b0533..b2017d8161b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -2318,13 +2318,6 @@ int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq));
> }
>
> - if (min_cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "required cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> - min_cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> return min_cdclk;
> }
>
> @@ -2332,7 +2325,7 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> struct intel_atomic_state *state = cdclk_state->base.state;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> - struct intel_bw_state *bw_state = NULL;
> + const struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> int min_cdclk, i;
> @@ -2345,10 +2338,6 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> if (min_cdclk < 0)
> return min_cdclk;
>
> - bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> - if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> - return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
> -
> if (cdclk_state->min_cdclk[crtc->pipe] == min_cdclk)
> continue;
>
> @@ -2359,14 +2348,31 @@ static int intel_compute_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - min_cdclk = cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk;
> - for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> + bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> + if (bw_state) {
> + min_cdclk = intel_bw_min_cdclk(dev_priv, bw_state);
> +
> + if (cdclk_state->bw_min_cdclk != min_cdclk) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + cdclk_state->bw_min_cdclk = min_cdclk;
> +
> + ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&cdclk_state->base);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk,
> + cdclk_state->bw_min_cdclk);
> + for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe)
> min_cdclk = max(cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
>
> - if (!bw_state)
> - continue;
> -
> - min_cdclk = max(bw_state->min_cdclk, min_cdclk);
> + if (min_cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "required cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> + min_cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> return min_cdclk;
> @@ -2647,14 +2653,10 @@ intel_atomic_get_cdclk_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> bool *need_cdclk_calc)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state;
> const struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
> - struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
> struct intel_plane *plane;
> - int min_cdclk = 0;
> - enum pipe pipe;
> int ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -2669,6 +2671,10 @@ int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(state, need_cdclk_calc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> old_cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
> new_cdclk_state = intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
>
> @@ -2676,23 +2682,6 @@ int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> old_cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk != new_cdclk_state->force_min_cdclk)
> *need_cdclk_calc = true;
>
> - ret = intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(state);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> -
> - if (!new_cdclk_state || !new_bw_state)
> - return 0;
> -
> - for_each_pipe(i915, pipe) {
> - min_cdclk = max(new_cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe], min_cdclk);
> -
> - /* Currently do this change only if we need to increase */
> - if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk > min_cdclk)
> - *need_cdclk_calc = true;
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index df66f66fbad0..b535cf6a7d9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ struct intel_cdclk_state {
> */
> struct intel_cdclk_config actual;
>
> + /* minimum acceptable cdclk to satisfy bandwidth requirements */
> + int bw_min_cdclk;
> /* minimum acceptable cdclk for each pipe */
> int min_cdclk[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> /* minimum acceptable voltage level for each pipe */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list