[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915: fixup the initial fb base on DGFX
Das, Nirmoy
nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 15 11:08:53 UTC 2022
|This seems more natural to me than the previous version. Acked-by:
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com> |
Nirmoy
On 14/03/2022 12:28, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On integrated it looks like the GGTT base should always 1:1 maps to
> somewhere within DSM. On discrete the base seems to be pre-programmed with
> a normal lmem address, and is not 1:1 mapped with the base address. On
> such devices probe the lmem address directly from the PTE.
>
> v2(Ville):
> - The base is actually the pre-programmed GGTT address, which is then
> meant to 1:1 map to somewhere inside dsm. In the case of dgpu the
> base looks to just be some offset within lmem, but this also happens
> to be the exact dsm start, on dg1. Therefore we should only need to
> fudge the physical address, before allocating from stolen.
> - Bail if it's not located in dsm.
> v3:
> - Scratch that. There doesn't seem to be any relationship with the
> base and PTE address, on at least DG1. Let's instead just grab the
> lmem address from the PTE itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld<matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström<thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä<ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das<nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> index f797fcef18fc..7979929bb632 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
> @@ -47,17 +47,55 @@ static struct i915_vma *
> initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
> {
> - struct intel_memory_region *mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
> + struct intel_memory_region *mem;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
> + resource_size_t phys_base;
> u32 base, size;
> u64 pinctl;
>
> - if (!mem || plane_config->size == 0)
> + if (plane_config->size == 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + base = round_down(plane_config->base, I915_GTT_MIN_ALIGNMENT);
> + if (IS_DGFX(i915)) {
> + gen8_pte_t __iomem *gte = to_gt(i915)->ggtt->gsm;
> + gen8_pte_t pte;
> +
> + gte += base / I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + pte = ioread64(gte);
> + if (!(pte & GEN12_GGTT_PTE_LM)) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm,
> + "Initial plane programming missing PTE_LM bit\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + phys_base = pte & I915_GTT_PAGE_MASK;
> + mem = i915->mm.regions[INTEL_REGION_LMEM];
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't currently expect this to ever be placed in the
> + * stolen portion.
> + */
> + if (phys_base >= resource_size(&mem->region)) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm,
> + "Initial plane programming using invalid range, phys_base=%pa\n",
> + &phys_base);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> + "Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
> + &phys_base);
> + } else {
> + phys_base = base;
> + mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
> + }
> +
> + if (!mem)
> return NULL;
>
> - base = round_down(plane_config->base,
> - I915_GTT_MIN_ALIGNMENT);
> size = round_up(plane_config->base + plane_config->size,
> mem->min_page_size);
> size -= base;
> @@ -68,11 +106,11 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> * features.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE) &&
> + mem == i915->mm.stolen_region &&
> size * 2 > i915->stolen_usable_size)
> return NULL;
>
> - obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(i915->mm.stolen_region,
> - base, size, 0);
> + obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(mem, phys_base, size, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(obj))
> return NULL;
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20220315/5a5485a3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list