[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: Fix a infinite loop condition when order becomes 0
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Wed Mar 16 11:31:27 UTC 2022
On 16/03/2022 06:34, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
> handle a situation in the condition order-- == min_order,
> when order = 0 and min_order = 0, leading to order = -1,
> it now won't exit the loop. To avoid this problem,
> added a order check in the same condition, (i.e)
> when order is 0, we return -ENOSPC
>
> v2: use full name in email program and in Signed-off tag
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> index 72f52f293249..5ab66aaf2bbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (!IS_ERR(block))
> break;
>
> - if (order-- == min_order) {
> + if (!order || order-- == min_order) {
It shouldn't be possible to enter an infinite loop here, without first
tripping up the BUG_ON(order < min_order) further up, and for that, as
we discussed here[1], it sounded like the conclusion was to rather add a
simple check somewhere in drm_buddy_alloc_blocks() to reject any size
not aligned to the min_page_size?
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/477414/?series=101108&rev=1
> err = -ENOSPC;
> goto err_free;
> }
>
> base-commit: 3bd60c0259406c5ca3ce5cdc958fb910ad4b8175
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list