[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] test/gem_lmem_swapping: fix physical engine usage

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 24/03/2022 14:26, Matthew Auld wrote:
> DG2 seems to have too many physical engines, and during execbuf just hits:

FWIW it's not that DG2 has too many engines but the test was apparently 
broken (because considering legacy eb ring selector as consecutive index 
namespace within total number of engines is wrong) during porting to 
upstream codebase.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
> 	"execbuf with unknown ring: 5"
> 
> Convert the test over to using the non-legacy API where we instead fill
> the ctx with all the physical engines and then engine/ring becomes the
> index into this.
> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5192
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> index 193ff370..995a663f 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ verify_object(int i915, const struct object *obj,  unsigned int flags)
>   }
>   
>   static void move_to_lmem(int i915,
> +			 const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>   			 struct object *list,
>   			 unsigned int num,
>   			 uint32_t batch,
> @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void move_to_lmem(int i915,
>   		.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(obj),
>   		.buffer_count = 1 + num,
>   		.flags = I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC | I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT | engine,
> +		.rsvd1 = ctx->id,
>   	};
>   	unsigned int i, ret;
>   
> @@ -156,6 +158,7 @@ retry:
>   }
>   
>   static void __do_evict(int i915,
> +		       const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>   		       struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance *region,
>   		       struct params *params,
>   		       unsigned int seed)
> @@ -170,7 +173,6 @@ static void __do_evict(int i915,
>   	struct timespec t = {};
>   	unsigned int num;
>   
> -	__gem_context_set_persistence(i915, 0, false);
>   	size = 4096;
>   	batch = create_bo(i915, &size, region, params->oom_test);
>   
> @@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ static void __do_evict(int i915,
>   		}
>   		obj->handle = create_bo(i915, &obj->size, region, params->oom_test);
>   
> -		move_to_lmem(i915, objects + i, 1, batch, engine,
> +		move_to_lmem(i915, ctx, objects + i, 1, batch, engine,
>   			     params->oom_test);
>   		if (params->flags & TEST_VERIFY)
>   			init_object(i915, obj, rand(), params->flags);
> @@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ static void __do_evict(int i915,
>   			idx = (idx + 1) % params->count;
>   		}
>   
> -		move_to_lmem(i915, list, num, batch, engine, params->oom_test);
> +		move_to_lmem(i915, ctx, list, num, batch, engine, params->oom_test);
>   
>   		if (params->flags & TEST_ENGINES)
>   			engine = (engine + 1) % __num_engines__;
> @@ -342,6 +344,7 @@ static void fill_params(int i915, struct params *params,
>   }
>   
>   static void test_evict(int i915,
> +		       const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>   		       struct drm_i915_memory_region_info *region,
>   		       unsigned int flags)
>   {
> @@ -353,14 +356,17 @@ static void test_evict(int i915,
>   	if (flags & TEST_PARALLEL) {
>   		int fd = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
>   
> +		ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(fd);
> +		__gem_context_set_persistence(i915, ctx->id, false);
> +
>   		igt_fork(child, nproc)
> -			__do_evict(fd, &region->region, &params,
> +			__do_evict(fd, ctx, &region->region, &params,
>   				   params.seed + child + 1);
>   
>   		igt_waitchildren();
>   		close(fd);
>   	} else {
> -		__do_evict(i915, &region->region, &params, params.seed);
> +		__do_evict(i915, ctx, &region->region, &params, params.seed);
>   	}
>   }
>   
> @@ -399,6 +405,7 @@ static void smem_oom_exit_handler(int sig)
>   }
>   
>   static void test_smem_oom(int i915,
> +			  const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
>   			  struct drm_i915_memory_region_info *region)
>   {
>   	const uint64_t smem_size = intel_get_total_ram_mb() +
> @@ -421,7 +428,7 @@ static void test_smem_oom(int i915,
>   		fill_params(i915, &params, region, 0, 1, true);
>   
>   		igt_install_exit_handler(smem_oom_exit_handler);
> -		__do_evict(fd, &region->region, &params,
> +		__do_evict(fd, ctx, &region->region, &params,
>   			   params.seed + child + 1);
>   
>   		close(fd);
> @@ -513,6 +520,7 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>   		{ "parallel-multi", TEST_PARALLEL | TEST_RANDOM | TEST_VERIFY | TEST_ENGINES | TEST_MULTI },
>   		{ }
>   	};
> +	const intel_ctx_t *ctx;
>   	int i915 = -1;
>   
>   	igt_fixture {
> @@ -528,17 +536,20 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>   		for_each_physical_engine(i915, e)
>   			__num_engines__++;
>   		igt_require(__num_engines__);
> +		ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(i915);
> +		__gem_context_set_persistence(i915, ctx->id, false);
> +
>   	}
>   
>   	for (test = tests; test->name; test++) {
>   		igt_describe("Exercise local memory swapping to system memory");
>   		dynamic_lmem_subtest(region, regions, test->name)
> -			test_evict(i915, region, test->flags);
> +			test_evict(i915, ctx, region, test->flags);
>   	}
>   
>   	igt_describe("Exercise local memory swapping during exhausting system memory");
>   	dynamic_lmem_subtest(region, regions, "smem-oom")
> -		test_smem_oom(i915, region);
> +		test_smem_oom(i915, ctx, region);
>   
>   	igt_fixture {
>   		free(regions);