[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/4] tests/gem_lmem_swapping: limit lmem to 4G
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Fri Mar 25 10:20:16 UTC 2022
On 25/03/2022 10:18, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:26:20PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> From: CQ Tang <cq.tang at intel.com>
>>
>> On some systems lmem can be as large as 16G, which seems to trigger
>> various CI timeouts, and in the best case just takes a long time. For
>> the purposes of the test we should be able to limit to 4G, without any
>> big loss in coverage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> index 995a663f..ad1c989c 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> @@ -526,7 +526,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>> igt_fixture {
>> struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
>>
>> - i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> + igt_i915_driver_unload();
>> + if (igt_i915_driver_load("lmem_size=4096")) {
>> + igt_debug("i915 missing lmem_size modparam support\n");
>> + igt_assert_eq(igt_i915_driver_load(NULL), 0);
>> + }
>
> Does the driver load truly fail with an unknown param?
Yeah, I have since removed that. From the CI logs it just loads anyway...
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list