[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/pvc: Engines definitions for new copy engines
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Fri May 6 14:29:22 UTC 2022
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:21:46AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/05/2022 21:59, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:05:43AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02/05/2022 17:34, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the basic definitions needed to support
> > > > new copy engines. Also updating the cmd_info to accommodate
> > > > new engines, as the engine id's of legacy engines have been
> > > > changed.
> > > >
> > > > Original-author: CQ Tang
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 10 +++-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 8 +++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 +++
> > > > 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > index 14c6ddbbfde8..4532c3ea9ace 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > > @@ -71,6 +71,62 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
> > > > { .graphics_ver = 6, .base = BLT_RING_BASE }
> > > > },
> > > > },
> > > > + [BCS1] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 1,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS1_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS2] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 2,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS2_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS3] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 3,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS3_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS4] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 4,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS4_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS5] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 5,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS5_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS6] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 6,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS6_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS7] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 7,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS7_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > + [BCS8] = {
> > > > + .class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
> > > > + .instance = 8,
> > > > + .mmio_bases = {
> > > > + { .graphics_ver = 12, .base = XEHPC_BCS8_RING_BASE }
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > > > [VCS0] = {
> > > > .class = VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS,
> > > > .instance = 0,
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> > > > index 298f2cc7a879..356c15cdccf0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> > > > #define OTHER_CLASS 4
> > > > #define COMPUTE_CLASS 5
> > > > #define MAX_ENGINE_CLASS 5
> > > > -#define MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE 7
> > > > +#define MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE 8
> > > > #define I915_MAX_SLICES 3
> > > > #define I915_MAX_SUBSLICES 8
> > > > @@ -107,6 +107,14 @@ struct i915_ctx_workarounds {
> > > > enum intel_engine_id {
> > > > RCS0 = 0,
> > > > BCS0,
> > > > + BCS1,
> > > > + BCS2,
> > > > + BCS3,
> > > > + BCS4,
> > > > + BCS5,
> > > > + BCS6,
> > > > + BCS7,
> > > > + BCS8,
> > >
> > > _BCS(n) macro will not be required?
> > >
> > > > VCS0,
> > > > VCS1,
> > > > VCS2,
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > index a0a49c16babd..aa2c0974b02c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > @@ -1476,6 +1476,14 @@
> > > > #define GEN11_KCR (19)
> > > > #define GEN11_GTPM (16)
> > > > #define GEN11_BCS (15)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS1 (14)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS2 (13)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS3 (12)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS4 (11)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS5 (10)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS6 (9)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS7 (8)
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS8 (23)
> > > > #define GEN12_CCS3 (7)
> > > > #define GEN12_CCS2 (6)
> > > > #define GEN12_CCS1 (5)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
> > > > index b9eb75a2b400..0ba2a3455d99 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
> > > > @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ struct cmd_info {
> > > > #define R_VECS BIT(VECS0)
> > > > #define R_ALL (R_RCS | R_VCS | R_BCS | R_VECS)
> > > > /* rings that support this cmd: BLT/RCS/VCS/VECS */
> > > > - u16 rings;
> > > > + intel_engine_mask_t rings;
> > >
> > > Looks like mask already overflows u16 even without the blitter engines.
> > > (When CCS were added.) Meaning maybe there should be a separate patch to fix
> > > it.
> >
> > Adding the CCS engines didn't cause a problem because GVT only includes
> > the gen11 set of engines in R_ALL. Since the CCS engines (and even the
> > higher instances of VCS/VECS introduced by Xe_HP) are never used
> > anywhere in GVT, there's no overflow possible...the highest bit they
> > ever use anywhere is VECS0; before this patch, that was bit(10) and fit
> > within a u16 comfortably. But since the new BCS engines added by this
> > patch get inserted at lower values within the engine_id enum, the
> > location of VECS0 moves up to bit(18), which falls outside the u16
> > definition and triggers a build failure:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c:429:15: error: conversion from ‘long unsigned int’ to ‘short unsigned int’ changes value from ‘265219’ to ‘3075’ [-Werror=overflow]
> > 429 | #define R_ALL (R_RCS | R_VCS | R_BCS | R_VECS)
>
> Well I did not know why GVT does not support CCS, or when it will start
> supporting it. If that support would happen in a kernel with CCS support,
I believe GVT only supports up through gen11 (even gen12 support is
missing today if I understand correctly). Since the CCS engines only
arrive with Xe_HP they aren't really relevant to GVT right now.
Matt
> but not this PVC patch then it would need the above hunk. So fundamentally
> it sounded the hunk belongs to a separate patch. But unless Zhi can comment
> I guess you are okay to proceed with what you have.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> > >
> > > But good question though is GVT supporting CCS and should it be part of
> > > R_ALL? Or should this patch even be touching GVT since CCS enablement did
> > > not? Adding Zhi to comment.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tvrtko
> > >
> > > > /* devices that support this cmd: SNB/IVB/HSW/... */
> > > > u16 devices;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > index 4a3d7b96ef43..ab64ab4317b3 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > @@ -976,6 +976,14 @@
> > > > #define GEN12_COMPUTE2_RING_BASE 0x1e000
> > > > #define GEN12_COMPUTE3_RING_BASE 0x26000
> > > > #define BLT_RING_BASE 0x22000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS1_RING_BASE 0x3e0000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS2_RING_BASE 0x3e2000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS3_RING_BASE 0x3e4000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS4_RING_BASE 0x3e6000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS5_RING_BASE 0x3e8000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS6_RING_BASE 0x3ea000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS7_RING_BASE 0x3ec000
> > > > +#define XEHPC_BCS8_RING_BASE 0x3ee000
> > > > #define DG1_GSC_HECI1_BASE 0x00258000
> > > > #define DG1_GSC_HECI2_BASE 0x00259000
> > > > #define DG2_GSC_HECI1_BASE 0x00373000
> >
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list