[Intel-gfx] [RFC v2 1/2] drm/doc/rfc: VM_BIND feature design document

Mon May 9 23:11:16 UTC 2022

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:41:35AM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:45:25PM -0700, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:28:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>Adding a pile of people who've expressed interest in vm_bind for their
>>>drivers.
>>>
>>>Also note to the intel folks: This is largely written with me having my
>>>subsystem co-maintainer hat on, i.e. what I think is the right thing to do
>>>here for the subsystem at large. There is substantial rework involved
>>>here, but it's not any different from i915 adopting ttm or i915 adpoting
>>>drm/sched, and I do think this stuff needs to happen in one form or
>>>another.
>>>
>>>On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:31:45PM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>>>VM_BIND design document with description of intended use cases.
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com>
>>>>---
>>>>Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst        |   4 +
>>>>2 files changed, 214 insertions(+)
>>>>create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst
>>>>new file mode 100644
>>>>index 000000000000..cdc6bb25b942
>>>>--- /dev/null
>>>>+++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.rst
>>>>@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
>>>>+==========================================
>>>>+I915 VM_BIND feature design and use cases
>>>>+==========================================
>>>>+
>>>>+VM_BIND feature
>>>>+================
>>>>+DRM_I915_GEM_VM_BIND/UNBIND ioctls allows UMD to bind/unbind GEM buffer
>>>>+objects (BOs) or sections of a BOs at specified GPU virtual addresses on
>>>>+a specified address space (VM).
>>>>+
>>>>+These mappings (also referred to as persistent mappings) will be persistent
>>>>+across multiple GPU submissions (execbuff) issued by the UMD, without user
>>>>+having to provide a list of all required mappings during each submission
>>>>+(as required by older execbuff mode).
>>>>+
>>>>+VM_BIND ioctl deferes binding the mappings until next execbuff submission
>>>>+where it will be required, or immediately if I915_GEM_VM_BIND_IMMEDIATE
>>>>+flag is set (useful if mapping is required for an active context).
>>>
>>>So this is a screw-up I've done, and for upstream I think we need to fix
>>>it: Implicit sync is bad, and it's also still a bad idea for vm_bind, and
>>>I was wrong suggesting we should do this a few years back when we kicked
>>>this off internally :-(
>>>
>>>What I think we need is just always VM_BIND_IMMEDIATE mode, and then a few
>>>things on top:
>>>- in and out fences, like with execbuf, to allow userspace to sync with
>>>execbuf as needed
>>>- for compute-mode context this means userspace memory fences
>>>- for legacy context this means a timeline syncobj in drm_syncobj
>>>
>>>No sync_file or anything else like this at all. This means a bunch of
>>>work, but also it'll have benefits because it means we should be able to
>>>use exactly the same code paths and logic for both compute and for legacy
>>>context, because drm_syncobj support future fence semantics.
>>>
>>
>>Thanks Daniel,
>>Ok, will update
>>
>
>I had a long conversation with Daniel on some of the points discussed here.
>Thanks to Daniel for clarifying many points here.
>
>Here is the summary of the discussion.
>
>1) A prep patch is needed to update documentation of some existing uapi and this
>  new VM_BIND uapi can update/refer to that.
>  I will include this prep patch in the next revision of this RFC series.
>  Will also include the uapi header file in the rst file so that it gets rendered.
>
>2) Will update documentation here with proper use of dma_resv_usage while adding
>  fences to vm_bind objects. It is going to be, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP by default
>  if not override with execlist in execbuff path.
>
>3) Add extension to execbuff ioctl to specify batch buffer as GPU virtual address
>  instead of having to pass it as a BO handle in execlist. This will also make the
>  execlist usage solely for implicit sync setting which is further discussed below.
>
>4) Need to look into when will Jason's dma-buf fence import/export ioctl support will
>  land and whether it will be used both for vl and gl. Need to sync with Jason on this.
>  Probably the better option here would be to not support execlist in execbuff path in
>  vm_bind mode for initial vm_bind support (hoping Jason's dma-buf fence import/export
>  ioctl will be enough). We can add support for execlist in execbuff for vm_bind mode
>  later if required (say for gl).
>
>5) There are lot of things in execbuff path that doesn't apply in VM_BIND mode (like
>  relocations, implicit sync etc). Separate them out by using function pointers wherever
>  the functionality differs between current design and the newer VM_BIND design.
>
>6) Separate out i915_vma active reference counting in execbuff path and do not use it in
>  VM_BIND mode. Instead use dma-resv fence checking for VM_BIND mode. This should be easier
>  to get it working with the current TTM backend (which initial VM_BIND support will use).
>  And remove i915_vma active reference counting fully while supporting TTM backend for igfx.
>
>7) As we support compute mode contexts only with GuC scheduler backend and compute mode requires
>  support for suspend and resume of contexts, it will have a dependency on i915 drm scheduler
>  conversion.
>
>Will revise this series accordingly.
>

I was prototyping some of these and they look good.
Still need to address few opens on dma-resv fence usage for VM_BIND. Like,
how to effectively update fence list during VM_BIND (for non VM private
objects).

I will be addressing these review comments and hoping to post updated
patch series by the end of this week or so.

Thanks,
Niranjana

>Thanks,
>Niranjana
>
>>>Also on the implementation side we still need to install dma_fence to the
>>>various dma_resv, and for this we need the new dma_resv_usage series from
>>>Christian König first. vm_bind fences can then use the USAGE_BOOKKEEPING
>>>flag to make sure they never result in an oversync issue with execbuf. I
>>>don't think trying to land vm_bind without that prep work in
>>>dma_resv_usage makes sense.
>>>
>>
>>Ok, but that is not a dependency for this VM_BIND design RFC patch right?
>>I will add this to the documentation here.
>>
>>>Also as soon as dma_resv_usage has landed there's a few cleanups we should
>>>do in i915:
>>>- ttm bo moving code should probably simplify a bit (and maybe more of the
>>>code should be pushed as helpers into ttm)
>>>- clflush code should be moved over to using USAGE_KERNEL and the various
>>>hacks and special cases should be ditched. See df94fd05e69e ("drm/i915:
>>>expand on the kernel-doc for cache_dirty") for a bit more context
>>>
>>>This is still not yet enough, since if a vm_bind races with an eviction we
>>>might stall on the new buffers being readied first before the context can
>>>continue. This needs some care to make sure that vma which aren't fully
>>>bound yet are on a separate list, and vma which are marked for unbinding
>>>are removed from the main working set list as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>All of these things are relevant for the uapi semantics, which means
>>>- they need to be documented in the uapi kerneldoc, ideally with example
>>>flows
>>>- umd need to ack this
>>>
>>
>>Ok
>>
>>>The other thing here is the async/nonblocking path. I think we still need
>>>that one, but again it should not sync with anything going on in execbuf,
>>>but simply execute the ioctl code in a kernel thread. The idea here is
>>>that this works like a special gpu engine, so that compute and vk can
>>>schedule bindings interleaved with rendering. This should be enough to get
>>>a performant vk sparse binding/textures implementation.
>>>
>>>But I'm not entirely sure on this one, so this definitely needs acks from
>>>umds.
>>>
>>>>+VM_BIND feature is advertised to user via I915_PARAM_HAS_VM_BIND.
>>>>+User has to opt-in for VM_BIND mode of binding for an address space (VM)
>>>>+during VM creation time via I915_VM_CREATE_FLAGS_USE_VM_BIND extension.
>>>>+A VM in VM_BIND mode will not support older execbuff mode of binding.
>>>>+
>>>>+UMDs can still send BOs of these persistent mappings in execlist of execbuff
>>>>+for specifying BO dependencies (implicit fencing) and to use BO as a batch,
>>>>+but those BOs should be mapped ahead via vm_bind ioctl.
>>>
>>>should or must?
>>>
>>
>>Must, will fix.
>>
>>>Also I'm not really sure that's a great interface. The batchbuffer really
>>>only needs to be an address, so maybe all we need is an extension to
>>>supply an u64 batchbuffer address instead of trying to retrofit this into
>>>an unfitting current uapi.
>>>
>>
>>Yah, this was considered, but was decided to do it as later optimization.
>>But if we were to remove execlist entries completely (ie., no implicit
>>sync also), then we need to do this from the beginning.
>>
>>>And for implicit sync there's two things:
>>>- for vk I think the right uapi is the dma-buf fence import/export ioctls
>>>from Jason Ekstrand. I think we should land that first instead of
>>>hacking funny concepts together
>>
>>I did not understand fully, can you point to it?
>>
>>>- for gl the dma-buf import/export might not be fast enough, since gl
>>>needs to do a _lot_ of implicit sync. There we might need to use the
>>>execbuffer buffer list, but then we should have extremely clear uapi
>>>rules which disallow _everything_ except setting the explicit sync uapi
>>>
>>
>>Ok, so then, we still need to support implicit sync in vm_bind mode. Right?
>>
>>>Again all this stuff needs to be documented in detail in the kerneldoc
>>>uapi spec.
>>>
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>>+VM_BIND features include,
>>>>+- Multiple Virtual Address (VA) mappings can map to the same physical pages
>>>>+  of an object (aliasing).
>>>>+- VA mapping can map to a partial section of the BO (partial binding).
>>>>+- Support capture of persistent mappings in the dump upon GPU error.
>>>>+- TLB is flushed upon unbind completion. Batching of TLB flushes in some
>>>>+  usecases will be helpful.
>>>>+- Asynchronous vm_bind and vm_unbind support.
>>>>+- VM_BIND uses user/memory fence mechanism for signaling bind completion
>>>>+  and for signaling batch completion in long running contexts (explained
>>>>+  below).
>>>
>>>This should all be in the kerneldoc.
>>>
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>>+VM_PRIVATE objects
>>>>+------------------
>>>>+By default, BOs can be mapped on multiple VMs and can also be dma-buf
>>>>+exported. Hence these BOs are referred to as Shared BOs.
>>>>+During each execbuff submission, the request fence must be added to the
>>>>+dma-resv fence list of all shared BOs mapped on the VM.
>>>>+
>>>>+VM_BIND feature introduces an optimization where user can create BO which
>>>>+is private to a specified VM via I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_VM_PRIVATE flag during
>>>>+BO creation. Unlike Shared BOs, these VM private BOs can only be mapped on
>>>>+the VM they are private to and can't be dma-buf exported.
>>>>+All private BOs of a VM share the dma-resv object. Hence during each execbuff
>>>>+submission, they need only one dma-resv fence list updated. Thus the fast
>>>>+path (where required mappings are already bound) submission latency is O(1)
>>>>+w.r.t the number of VM private BOs.
>>>
>>>Two things:
>>>
>>>- I think the above is required to for initial vm_bind for vk, it kinda
>>>doesn't make much sense without that, and will allow us to match amdgpu
>>>and radeonsi
>>>
>>>- Christian König just landed ttm bulk lru helpers, and I think we need to
>>>use those. This means vm_bind will only work with the ttm backend, but
>>>that's what we have for the big dgpu where vm_bind helps more in terms
>>>of performance, and the igfx conversion to ttm is already going on.
>>>
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>Furthermore the i915 shrinker lru has stopped being an lru, so I think
>>>that should also be moved over to the ttm lru in some fashion to make sure
>>>we once again have a reasonable and consistent memory aging and reclaim
>>>architecture. The current code is just too much of a complete mess.
>>>
>>>And since this is all fairly integral to how the code arch works I don't
>>>think merging a different version which isn't based on ttm bulk lru
>>>helpers makes sense.
>>>
>>>Also I do think the page table lru handling needs to be included here,
>>>because that's another complete hand-rolled separate world for not much
>>>good reasons. I guess that can happen in parallel with the initial vm_bind
>>>bring-up, but it needs to be completed by the time we add the features
>>>beyond the initial support needed for vk.
>>>
>>
>>Ok
>>
>>>>+VM_BIND locking hirarchy
>>>>+-------------------------
>>>>+VM_BIND locking order is as below.
>>>>+
>>>>+1) A vm_bind mutex will protect vm_bind lists. This lock is taken in vm_bind/
>>>>+   vm_unbind ioctl calls, in the execbuff path and while releasing the mapping.
>>>>+
>>>>+   In future, when GPU page faults are supported, we can potentially use a
>>>>+   rwsem instead, so that multiple pagefault handlers can take the read side
>>>>+   lock to lookup the mapping and hence can run in parallel.
>>>>+
>>>>+2) The BO's dma-resv lock will protect i915_vma state and needs to be held
>>>>+   while binding a vma and while updating dma-resv fence list of a BO.
>>>>+   The private BOs of a VM will all share a dma-resv object.
>>>>+
>>>>+   This lock is held in vm_bind call for immediate binding, during vm_unbind
>>>>+   call for unbinding and during execbuff path for binding the mapping and
>>>>+   updating the dma-resv fence list of the BO.
>>>>+
>>>>+3) Spinlock/s to protect some of the VM's lists.
>>>>+
>>>>+We will also need support for bluk LRU movement of persistent mapping to
>>>>+avoid additional latencies in execbuff path.
>>>
>>>This needs more detail and explanation of how each level is required. Also
>>>the shared dma_resv for VM_PRIVATE objects is kinda important to explain.
>>>
>>>Like "some of the VM's lists" explains pretty much nothing.
>>>
>>
>>Ok, will explain.
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+GPU page faults
>>>>+----------------
>>>>+Both older execbuff mode and the newer VM_BIND mode of binding will require
>>>>+using dma-fence to ensure residency.
>>>>+In future when GPU page faults are supported, no dma-fence usage is required
>>>>+as residency is purely managed by installing and removing/invalidating ptes.
>>>
>>>This is a bit confusing. I think one part of this should be moved into the
>>>section with future vm_bind use-cases (we're not going to support page
>>>faults with legacy softpin or even worse, relocations). The locking
>>>discussion should be part of the much longer list of uses cases that
>>>motivate the locking design.
>>>
>>
>>Ok, will move.
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+
>>>>+User/Memory Fence
>>>>+==================
>>>>+The idea is to take a user specified virtual address and install an interrupt
>>>>+handler to wake up the current task when the memory location passes the user
>>>>+supplied filter.
>>>>+
>>>>+User/Memory fence is a <address, value> pair. To signal the user fence,
>>>>+specified value will be written at the specified virtual address and
>>>>+wakeup the waiting process. User can wait on an user fence with the
>>>>+gem_wait_user_fence ioctl.
>>>>+
>>>>+It also allows the user to emit their own MI_FLUSH/PIPE_CONTROL notify
>>>>+interrupt within their batches after updating the value to have sub-batch
>>>>+precision on the wakeup. Each batch can signal an user fence to indicate
>>>>+the completion of next level batch. The completion of very first level batch
>>>>+needs to be signaled by the command streamer. The user must provide the
>>>>+user/memory fence for this via the DRM_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER_EXT_USER_FENCE
>>>>+extension of execbuff ioctl, so that KMD can setup the command streamer to
>>>>+signal it.
>>>>+
>>>>+User/Memory fence can also be supplied to the kernel driver to signal/wake up
>>>>+the user process after completion of an asynchronous operation.
>>>>+
>>>>+When VM_BIND ioctl was provided with a user/memory fence via the
>>>>+I915_VM_BIND_EXT_USER_FENCE extension, it will be signaled upon the completion
>>>>+of binding of that mapping. All async binds/unbinds are serialized, hence
>>>>+signaling of user/memory fence also indicate the completion of all previous
>>>>+binds/unbinds.
>>>>+
>>>>+This feature will be derived from the below original work:
>>>>+https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/349417/
>>>
>>>This is 1:1 tied to long running compute mode contexts (which in the uapi
>>>doc must reference the endless amounts of bikeshed summary we have in the
>>>docs about indefinite fences).
>>>
>>
>>Ok, will check and add reference.
>>
>>>I'd put this into a new section about compute and userspace memory fences
>>>support, with this and the next chapter ...
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+
>>>>+VM_BIND use cases
>>>>+==================
>>>
>>>... and then make this section here focus entirely on additional vm_bind
>>>use-cases that we'll be adding later on. Which doesn't need to go into any
>>>details, it's just justification for why we want to build the world on top
>>>of vm_bind.
>>>
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+Long running Compute contexts
>>>>+------------------------------
>>>>+Usage of dma-fence expects that they complete in reasonable amount of time.
>>>>+Compute on the other hand can be long running. Hence it is appropriate for
>>>>+compute to use user/memory fence and dma-fence usage will be limited to
>>>>+in-kernel consumption only. This requires an execbuff uapi extension to pass
>>>>+in user fence. Compute must opt-in for this mechanism with
>>>>+I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_LONG_RUNNING flag during context creation.
>>>>+
>>>>+The dma-fence based user interfaces like gem_wait ioctl, execbuff out fence
>>>>+and implicit dependency setting is not allowed on long running contexts.
>>>>+
>>>>+Where GPU page faults are not available, kernel driver upon buffer invalidation
>>>>+will initiate a suspend (preemption) of long running context with a dma-fence
>>>>+attached to it. And upon completion of that suspend fence, finish the
>>>>+invalidation, revalidate the BO and then resume the compute context. This is
>>>>+done by having a per-context fence (called suspend fence) proxying as
>>>>+i915_request fence. This suspend fence is enabled when there is a wait on it,
>>>>+which triggers the context preemption.
>>>>+
>>>>+This is much easier to support with VM_BIND compared to the current heavier
>>>>+execbuff path resource attachment.
>>>
>>>There's a bunch of tricky code around compute mode context support, like
>>>the preempt ctx fence (or suspend fence or whatever you want to call it),
>>>and the resume work. And I think that code should be shared across
>>>drivers.
>>>
>>>I think the right place to put this is into drm/sched, somewhere attached
>>>to the drm_sched_entity structure. I expect i915 folks to collaborate with
>>>amd and ideally also get amdkfd to adopt the same thing if possible. At
>>>least Christian has mentioned in the past that he's a bit unhappy about
>>>how this works.
>>>
>>>Also drm/sched has dependency tracking, which will be needed to pipeline
>>>context resume operations. That needs to be used instead of i915-gem
>>>inventing yet another dependency tracking data structure (it already has 3
>>>and that's roughly 3 too many).
>>>
>>>This means compute mode support and userspace memory fences are blocked on
>>>the drm/sched conversion, but *eh* add it to the list of reasons for why
>>>drm/sched needs to happen.
>>>
>>>Also since we only have support for compute mode ctx in our internal tree
>>>with the guc scheduler backend anyway, and the first conversion target is
>>>the guc backend, I don't think this actually holds up a lot of the code.
>>>
>>
>>Hmm...ok. Currently, the context suspend and resume operations in out
>>internal tree is through an orthogonal guc interface (not through scheduler).
>>So, I need to look more into this part.
>>
>>>>+Low Latency Submission
>>>>+-----------------------
>>>>+Allows compute UMD to directly submit GPU jobs instead of through execbuff
>>>>+ioctl. VM_BIND allows map/unmap of BOs required for directly submitted jobs.
>>>
>>>This is really just a special case of compute mode contexts, I think I'd
>>>include that in there, but explain better what it requires (i.e. vm_bind
>>>not being synchronized against execbuf).
>>>
>>
>>ok
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+Debugger
>>>>+---------
>>>>+With debug event interface user space process (debugger) is able to keep track
>>>>+of and act upon resources created by another process (debuggee) and attached
>>>>+to GPU via vm_bind interface.
>>>>+
>>>>+Mesa/Valkun
>>>>+------------
>>>>+VM_BIND can potentially reduce the CPU-overhead in Mesa thus improving
>>>>+performance. For Vulkan it should be straightforward to use VM_BIND.
>>>>+For Iris implicit buffer tracking must be implemented before we can harness
>>>>+VM_BIND benefits. With increasing GPU hardware performance reducing CPU
>>>>+overhead becomes more important.
>>>
>>>Just to clarify, I don't think we can land vm_bind into upstream if it
>>>doesn't work 100% for vk. There's a bit much "can" instead of "will in
>>>this section".
>>>
>>
>>ok, will explain better.
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+Page level hints settings
>>>>+--------------------------
>>>>+VM_BIND allows any hints setting per mapping instead of per BO.
>>>>+Possible hints include read-only, placement and atomicity.
>>>>+Sub-BO level placement hint will be even more relevant with
>>>>+upcoming GPU on-demand page fault support.
>>>>+
>>>>+Page level Cache/CLOS settings
>>>>+-------------------------------
>>>>+VM_BIND allows cache/CLOS settings per mapping instead of per BO.
>>>>+
>>>>+Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) support
>>>>+------------------------------------
>>>>+VM_BIND interface can be used to map system memory directly (without gem BO
>>>>+abstraction) using the HMM interface.
>>>
>>>Userptr is absent here (and it's not the same as svm, at least on
>>>discrete), and this is needed for the initial version since otherwise vk
>>>can't use it because we're not at feature parity.
>>>
>>
>>userptr gem objects are supported in initial version (and yes it is not
>>same as SVM). I did not add it here as there is no additional uapi
>>change required to support that.
>>
>>>Irc discussions by Maarten and Dave came up with the idea that maybe
>>>userptr for vm_bind should work _without_ any gem bo as backing storage,
>>>since that guarantees that people don't come up with funny ideas like
>>>trying to share such bo across process or mmap it and other nonsense which
>>>just doesn't work.
>>>
>>
>>Hmm...there is no plan to support userptr _without_ gem bo not atleast in
>>the initial vm_bind support. Is it Ok to put it in the 'futues' section?
>>
>>>>+
>>>>+
>>>>+Broder i915 cleanups
>>>>+=====================
>>>>+Supporting this whole new vm_bind mode of binding which comes with its own
>>>>+usecases to support and the locking requirements requires proper integration
>>>>+with the existing i915 driver. This calls for some broader i915 driver
>>>>+cleanups/simplifications for maintainability of the driver going forward.
>>>>+Here are few things identified and are being looked into.
>>>>+
>>>>+- Make pagetable allocations evictable and manage them similar to VM_BIND
>>>>+  mapped objects. Page table pages are similar to persistent mappings of a
>>>>+  VM (difference here are that the page table pages will not
>>>>+  have an i915_vma structure and after swapping pages back in, parent page
>>>>+  link needs to be updated).
>>>
>>>See above, but I think this should be included as part of the initial
>>>vm_bind push.
>>>
>>
>>Ok, as you mentioned above, we can do it soon after initial vm_bind support
>>lands, but before we add any new vm_bind features.
>>
>>>>+- Remove vma lookup cache (eb->gem_context->handles_vma). VM_BIND feature
>>>>+  do not use it and complexity it brings in is probably more than the
>>>>+  performance advantage we get in legacy execbuff case.
>>>>+- Remove vma->open_count counting
>>>>+- Remove i915_vma active reference tracking. Instead use underlying BO's
>>>>+  dma-resv fence list to determine if a i915_vma is active or not.
>>>
>>>So this is a complete mess, and really should not exist. I think it needs
>>>to be removed before we try to make i915_vma even more complex by adding
>>>vm_bind.
>>>
>>
>>Hmm...Need to look into this. I am not sure how much of an effort it is going
>>to be to remove i915_vma active reference tracking and instead use dma_resv
>>fences for activeness tracking.
>>
>>>The other thing I've been pondering here is that vm_bind is really
>>>completely different from legacy vm structures for a lot of reasons:
>>>- no relocation or softpin handling, which means vm_bind has no reason to
>>>ever look at the i915_vma structure in execbuf code. Unfortunately
>>>execbuf has been rewritten to be vma instead of obj centric, so it's a
>>>100% mismatch
>>>
>>>- vm_bind never has to manage any vm lru. Legacy execbuf has to maintain
>>>that because the kernel manages the virtual address space fully. Again
>>>ideally that entire vma_move_to_active code and everything related to it
>>>would simply not exist.
>>>
>>>- similar on the eviction side, the rules are quite different: For vm_bind
>>>we never tear down the vma, instead it's just moved to the list of
>>>evicted vma. Legacy vm have no need for all these additional lists, so
>>>another huge confusion.
>>>
>>>- if the refcount is done correctly for vm_bind we wouldn't need the
>>>tricky code in the bo close paths. Unfortunately legacy vm with
>>>relocations and softpin require that vma are only a weak reference, so
>>>that cannot be removed.
>>>
>>>- there's also a ton of special cases for ggtt handling, like the
>>>different views (for display, partial views for mmap), but also the
>>>gen2/3 alignment and padding requirements which vm_bind never needs.
>>>
>>>I think the right thing here is to massively split the implementation
>>>behind some solid vm/vma abstraction, with a base clase for vm and vma
>>>which _only_ has the pieces which both vm_bind and the legacy vm stuff
>>>needs. But it's a bit tricky to get there. I think a workable path would
>>>be:
>>>- Add a new base class to both i915_address_space and i915_vma, which
>>>starts out empty.
>>>
>>>- As vm_bind code lands, move things that vm_bind code needs into these
>>>base classes
>>>
>>
>>Ok
>>
>>>- The goal should be that these base classes are a stand-alone library
>>>that other drivers could reuse. Like we've done with the buddy
>>>allocator, which first moved from i915-gem to i915-ttm, and which amd
>>>now moved to drm/ttm for reuse by amdgpu. Ideally other drivers
>>>interested in adding something like vm_bind should be involved from the
>>>start (or maybe the entire thing reused in amdgpu, they're looking at
>>>vk sparse binding support too or at least have perf issues I think).
>>>
>>>- Locking must be the same across all implemntations, otherwise it's
>>>really not an abstract. i915 screwed this up terribly by having
>>>different locking rules for ppgtt and ggtt, which is just nonsense.
>>>
>>>- The legacy specific code needs to be extracted as much as possible and
>>>shoved into separate files. In execbuf this means we need to get back to
>>>object centric flow, and the slowpaths need to become a lot simpler
>>>again (Maarten has cleaned up some of this, but there's still a silly
>>>amount of hacks in there with funny layering).
>>>
>>
>>This also, we can do soon after vm_bind code lands right?
>>
>>>- I think if stuff like the vma eviction details (list movement and
>>>locking and refcounting of the underlying object)
>>>
>>>>+
>>>>+These can be worked upon after intitial vm_bind support is added.
>>>
>>>I don't think that works, given how badly i915-gem team screwed up in
>>>other places. And those places had to be fixed by adopting shared code
>>>like ttm. Plus there's already a huge unfulffiled promise pending with the
>>>drm/sched conversion, i915-gem team is clearly deeply in the red here :-/
>>>
>>
>>Hmmm ok. As I mentioned above, I need to look into how to remove i915_vma
>>active reference tracking code from i915 driver. Wonder if there is any
>>middle ground here like not using that in vm_bind mode?
>>
>>Niranjana
>>
>>>Cheers, Daniel
>>>
>>>>+
>>>>+
>>>>+UAPI
>>>>+=====
>>>>+Uapi definiton can be found here:
>>>>+.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_vm_bind.h
>>>>diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>index 91e93a705230..7d10c36b268d 100644
>>>>--- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>+++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>@@ -23,3 +23,7 @@ host such documentation:
>>>>.. toctree::
>>>>
>>>>    i915_scheduler.rst
>>>>+
>>>>+.. toctree::
>>>>+
>>>>+    i915_vm_bind.rst
>>>>--
>>>>2.21.0.rc0.32.g243a4c7e27
>>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Daniel Vetter
>>>Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>>>http://blog.ffwll.ch