[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: remove single-use GEM_DEBUG_EXEC()

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 05 May 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/2022 19:37, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Reduce the magic of what's going on in GEM_DEBUG_EXEC() by expanding it
>> inline and being explicit about it. It's as single use case anyway, so
>> the macro feels overkill.
>> 
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 3 ++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h      | 2 --
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>> index 40ffcb94e379..15ec64d881c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
>> @@ -299,7 +299,8 @@ u32 *intel_ring_begin(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int num_dwords)
>>   	GEM_BUG_ON(ring->emit > ring->size - bytes);
>>   	GEM_BUG_ON(ring->space < bytes);
>>   	cs = ring->vaddr + ring->emit;
>> -	GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(memset32(cs, POISON_INUSE, bytes / sizeof(*cs)));
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
>> +		memset32(cs, POISON_INUSE, bytes / sizeof(*cs));
>>   	ring->emit += bytes;
>>   	ring->space -= bytes;
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> index b7b257f54d2e..a2be323a4be5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
>> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>>   	} while(0)
>>   #define GEM_WARN_ON(expr) WARN_ON(expr)
>>   
>> -#define GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(expr) expr
>>   #define GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(expr) GEM_WARN_ON(expr)
>>   
>>   #else
>> @@ -64,7 +63,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>>   #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(expr)
>>   #define GEM_WARN_ON(expr) ({ unlikely(!!(expr)); })
>>   
>> -#define GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(expr) do { } while (0)
>>   #define GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(expr) ({ BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(expr); 0; })
>>   #endif
>>   
>
> Yeah one user after time passed suggests removing is the right course of 
> action.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Thanks, pushed the first two to din.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center