[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/rc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_error

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 13 May 2022, "Teres Alexis, Alan Previn" <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com> wrote:
> Nit: not sure why we use ERR_PTR for int when calling func was also returning an int.
> Anyway, that was how the original code was, so:

%pe on an error pointer prints the symbolic error name if
CONFIG_SYMBOLIC_ERRNAME=y and the errno is known, decimal error code
otherwise. It's not obvious, basically all the non-standard printf
formats are a bit mysterious, but there's also no neat alternative.


BR,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
>
>
> On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 22:41 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> To avoid false positives in error injection cases.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c
>> index e00661fb0853..8f8dd05835c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int guc_action_control_gucrc(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable)
>>  static int __guc_rc_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable)
>>  {
>>  	struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>> -	struct drm_device *drm = &guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_rc(&gt->uc))
>> @@ -60,8 +59,8 @@ static int __guc_rc_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable)
>>  
>>  	ret = guc_action_control_gucrc(guc, enable);
>>  	if (ret) {
>> -		drm_err(drm, "Failed to %s GuC RC (%pe)\n",
>> -			str_enable_disable(enable), ERR_PTR(ret));
>> +		i915_probe_error(guc_to_gt(guc)->i915, "Failed to %s GuC RC (%pe)\n",
>> +				 str_enable_disable(enable), ERR_PTR(ret));
>>  		return ret;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.35.1
>> 
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center