[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/sseu: Simplify gen11+ SSEU handling

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 17/05/2022 04:20, Matt Roper wrote:
> Although gen11 and gen12 architectures supported the concept of multiple
> slices, in practice all the platforms that were actually designed only
> had a single slice (i.e., note the parameters to 'intel_sseu_set_info'
> that we pass for each platform).  We can simplify the code slightly by
> dropping the multi-slice logic from gen11+ platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 80 ++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> index b5fd479a7b85..ade3e1805782 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> @@ -119,52 +119,37 @@ static u16 compute_eu_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
>   	return total;
>   }
>   
> -static u32 get_ss_stride_mask(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 s, u32 ss_en)
> -{
> -	u32 ss_mask;
> -
> -	ss_mask = ss_en >> (s * sseu->max_subslices);
> -	ss_mask &= GENMASK(sseu->max_subslices - 1, 0);
> -
> -	return ss_mask;
> -}
> -
> -static void gen11_compute_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 s_en,
> +static void gen11_compute_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
>   				    u32 g_ss_en, u32 c_ss_en, u16 eu_en)
>   {
> -	int s, ss;
> +	u32 valid_ss_mask = GENMASK(sseu->max_subslices - 1, 0);
> +	int ss;
>   
>   	/* g_ss_en/c_ss_en represent entire subslice mask across all slices */
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(sseu->max_slices * sseu->max_subslices >
>   		   sizeof(g_ss_en) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>   
> -	for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
> -		if ((s_en & BIT(s)) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +	sseu->slice_mask |= BIT(0);
>   
> -		sseu->slice_mask |= BIT(s);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * XeHP introduces the concept of compute vs geometry DSS. To
> -		 * reduce variation between GENs around subslice usage, store a
> -		 * mask for both the geometry and compute enabled masks since
> -		 * userspace will need to be able to query these masks
> -		 * independently.  Also compute a total enabled subslice count
> -		 * for the purposes of selecting subslices to use in a
> -		 * particular GEM context.
> -		 */
> -		intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->compute_subslice_mask,
> -					 get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s, c_ss_en));
> -		intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->geometry_subslice_mask,
> -					 get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s, g_ss_en));
> -		intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, s, sseu->subslice_mask,
> -					 get_ss_stride_mask(sseu, s,
> -							    g_ss_en | c_ss_en));
> +	/*
> +	 * XeHP introduces the concept of compute vs geometry DSS. To reduce
> +	 * variation between GENs around subslice usage, store a mask for both
> +	 * the geometry and compute enabled masks since userspace will need to
> +	 * be able to query these masks independently.  Also compute a total
> +	 * enabled subslice count for the purposes of selecting subslices to
> +	 * use in a particular GEM context.
> +	 */
> +	intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, 0, sseu->compute_subslice_mask,
> +				 c_ss_en & valid_ss_mask);
> +	intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, 0, sseu->geometry_subslice_mask,
> +				 g_ss_en & valid_ss_mask);
> +	intel_sseu_set_subslices(sseu, 0, sseu->subslice_mask,
> +				 (g_ss_en | c_ss_en) & valid_ss_mask);
> +
> +	for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++)
> +		if (intel_sseu_has_subslice(sseu, 0, ss))
> +			sseu_set_eus(sseu, 0, ss, eu_en);
>   
> -		for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++)
> -			if (intel_sseu_has_subslice(sseu, s, ss))
> -				sseu_set_eus(sseu, s, ss, eu_en);
> -	}
>   	sseu->eu_per_subslice = hweight16(eu_en);
>   	sseu->eu_total = compute_eu_total(sseu);
>   }
> @@ -196,7 +181,7 @@ static void xehp_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
>   		if (eu_en_fuse & BIT(eu))
>   			eu_en |= BIT(eu * 2) | BIT(eu * 2 + 1);
>   
> -	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, 0x1, g_dss_en, c_dss_en, eu_en);
> +	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, g_dss_en, c_dss_en, eu_en);
>   }
>   
>   static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> @@ -216,8 +201,15 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
>   	 */
>   	intel_sseu_set_info(sseu, 1, 6, 16);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Although gen12 architecture supported multiple slices, TGL, RKL,
> +	 * DG1, and ADL only had a single slice.
> +	 */
>   	s_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SLICE_ENABLE) &
>   		GEN11_GT_S_ENA_MASK;
> +	if (s_en != 0x1)
> +		drm_dbg(&gt->i915->drm, "Slice mask %#x is not the expected 0x1!\n",

I'd make these drm_warn - drm_dbg feels pointless. Possibly even 
drm_WARN_ON since it is supposed to be an impossible condition which 
needs to be super loud if it happens.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +			s_en);
>   
>   	g_dss_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN12_GT_GEOMETRY_DSS_ENABLE);
>   
> @@ -229,7 +221,7 @@ static void gen12_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
>   		if (eu_en_fuse & BIT(eu))
>   			eu_en |= BIT(eu * 2) | BIT(eu * 2 + 1);
>   
> -	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, g_dss_en, 0, eu_en);
> +	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, g_dss_en, 0, eu_en);
>   
>   	/* TGL only supports slice-level power gating */
>   	sseu->has_slice_pg = 1;
> @@ -248,14 +240,22 @@ static void gen11_sseu_info_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
>   	else
>   		intel_sseu_set_info(sseu, 1, 8, 8);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Although gen11 architecture supported multiple slices, ICL and
> +	 * EHL/JSL only had a single slice in practice.
> +	 */
>   	s_en = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SLICE_ENABLE) &
>   		GEN11_GT_S_ENA_MASK;
> +	if (s_en != 0x1)
> +		drm_dbg(&gt->i915->drm, "Slice mask %#x is not the expected 0x1!\n",
> +			s_en);
> +
>   	ss_en = ~intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_SUBSLICE_DISABLE);
>   
>   	eu_en = ~(intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_EU_DISABLE) &
>   		  GEN11_EU_DIS_MASK);
>   
> -	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, s_en, ss_en, 0, eu_en);
> +	gen11_compute_sseu_info(sseu, ss_en, 0, eu_en);
>   
>   	/* ICL has no power gating restrictions. */
>   	sseu->has_slice_pg = 1;