[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix VBT send packet port selection for ICL+

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 20 May 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:46:00PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The VBT send packet port selection was never updated for ICL+ where the
>> 2nd link is on port B instead of port C as in VLV+ DSI.
>> 
>> First, single link DSI needs to use the configured port instead of
>> relying on the VBT sequence block port. Remove the hard-coded port C
>> check here and make it generic. For reference, see commit f915084edc5a
>> ("drm/i915: Changes related to the sequence port no for") for the
>> original VLV specific fix.
>> 
>> Second, the sequence block port number is either 0 or 1, where 1
>> indicates the 2nd link. Remove the hard-coded port C here for 2nd
>> link. (This could be a "find second set bit" on DSI ports, but just
>> check the two possible options.)
>> 
>> Third, sanity check the result with a warning to avoid a NULL pointer
>> dereference.
>> 
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5984
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 33 +++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> index f370e9c4350d..dd24aef925f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> @@ -125,9 +125,25 @@ struct i2c_adapter_lookup {
>>  #define  ICL_GPIO_DDPA_CTRLCLK_2	8
>>  #define  ICL_GPIO_DDPA_CTRLDATA_2	9
>>  
>> -static enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(u8 port)
>> +static enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
>> +					    u8 seq_port)
>>  {
>> -	return port ? PORT_C : PORT_A;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If single link DSI is being used on any port, the VBT sequence block
>> +	 * send packet apparently always has 0 for the port. Just use the port
>> +	 * we have configured, and ignore the sequence block port.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (hweight8(intel_dsi->ports) == 1)
>> +		return ffs(intel_dsi->ports) - 1;
>> +
>> +	if (seq_port) {
>> +		if (intel_dsi->ports & PORT_B)
>> +			return PORT_B;
>> +		else if (intel_dsi->ports & PORT_C)
>> +			return PORT_C;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return PORT_A;
>
> Hmm. I guess a bit more generic way to express that could be
> to just pick the Nth set bit from intel_dsi->ports, where N==seq_port.
> Assuming seq_port is just an index. But I guess we're not really
> expecting to grow more DSI ports any time soon, so this seems
> sufficient for the current situation.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Thanks, pushed to drm-intel-next.

BR,
Jani.


>
>>  }
>>  
>>  static const u8 *mipi_exec_send_packet(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
>> @@ -149,15 +165,10 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_send_packet(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
>>  
>>  	seq_port = (flags >> MIPI_PORT_SHIFT) & 3;
>>  
>> -	/* For DSI single link on Port A & C, the seq_port value which is
>> -	 * parsed from Sequence Block#53 of VBT has been set to 0
>> -	 * Now, read/write of packets for the DSI single link on Port A and
>> -	 * Port C will based on the DVO port from VBT block 2.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (intel_dsi->ports == (1 << PORT_C))
>> -		port = PORT_C;
>> -	else
>> -		port = intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(seq_port);
>> +	port = intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(intel_dsi, seq_port);
>> +
>> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !intel_dsi->dsi_hosts[port]))
>> +		goto out;
>>  
>>  	dsi_device = intel_dsi->dsi_hosts[port]->device;
>>  	if (!dsi_device) {
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center