[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/7] vfio/ccw: move private to mdev lifecycle

[Matthew Rosato]

On 11/2/22 11:01 AM, Eric Farman wrote:
> Now that the mdev parent data is split out into its own struct,
> it is safe to move the remaining private data to follow the
> mdev probe/remove lifecycle. The mdev parent data will remain
> where it is, and follow the subchannel and the css driver
> interfaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c     | 15 +--------------
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c     | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 

...

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index eb0b8cc210bb..e45d4acb109b 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> @@ -100,15 +100,20 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  {
>  	struct subchannel *sch = to_subchannel(mdev->dev.parent);
>  	struct vfio_ccw_parent *parent = dev_get_drvdata(&sch->dev);
> -	struct vfio_ccw_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(&parent->dev);
> +	struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!private)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

Ha, looks like you time traveled and took my advice :)

In fact it looks like some of my other comments from patch 1 get cleaned up here too -- but would still be good to make those changes in patch 1 for completeness/bisect.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato at linux.ibm.com>