[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: mode clock check related to max dotclk frequency
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 9 10:36:44 UTC 2022
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022, Nischal Varide <nischal.varide at intel.com> wrote:
> A check on mode->clock to see if is greater than i915->max_dotclk_freq
> or greater than 2 * (i915_max_dotclk_freq) in case of big-joiner and
> return an -EINVAL in both the cases
The commit message should explain *why* the change is being done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nischal Varide <nischal.varide at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 7400d6b4c587..813f4c369dda 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -995,6 +995,10 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> bigjoiner = true;
> max_dotclk *= 2;
> }
> +
> + if (mode->clock > max_dotclk)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
The return type of this function is enum drm_mode_status, which
indicates the reason for rejecting the mode. It's not a negative error
code.
Near the top of the function we have "target_clock = mode->clock;"
making the above identical to the check we already have below. Apart
from the incorrect return code.
What are you trying to do?
BR,
Jani.
> if (target_clock > max_dotclk)
> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list