[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gt: Add sysfs RAPL PL1 interface

Sundaresan, Sujaritha sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com
Fri Nov 11 03:32:47 UTC 2022


On 11/9/2022 6:37 AM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2022 05:37:23 -0700, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> Hi Suja,
>
>> Adding the rapl_pl1_freq_mhz sysfs attribute.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c | 20 ++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  3 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h             |  4 ++
>>   4 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> index 904160952369..e7f00ec252f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> @@ -496,6 +496,17 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(vlv_rpe_freq_mhz);
>>   static const struct attribute * const gen6_rps_attrs[] = GEN6_RPS_ATTR;
>>   static const struct attribute * const gen6_gt_attrs[]  = GEN6_GT_ATTR;
>>
>> +static ssize_t rapl_pl1_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				      struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +				      char *buff)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_gt *gt = intel_gt_sysfs_get_drvdata(dev, attr->attr.name);
>> +	u32 rapl_pl1 = intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1_frequency(&gt->rps);
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buff, "%u\n", rapl_pl1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>>   static ssize_t punit_req_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
>> 				       struct device_attribute *attr,
>> 				       char *buff)
>> @@ -534,6 +545,7 @@ struct intel_gt_bool_throttle_attr attr_##sysfs_func__ = { \
>> 	.mask = mask__, \
>>   }
>>
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rapl_pl1_freq_mhz);
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(punit_req_freq_mhz);
> Is this patch against old code? Since this is now INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO. Yes the
> build failed. So rapl_pl1_freq_mhz will need to follow punit_req_freq_mhz.
Okay yes looks like I might not have grabbed the latest tree.
>
>>   static INTEL_GT_RPS_BOOL_ATTR_RO(throttle_reason_status, GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS_MASK);
>>   static INTEL_GT_RPS_BOOL_ATTR_RO(throttle_reason_pl1, POWER_LIMIT_1_MASK);
>> @@ -790,12 +802,20 @@ void intel_gt_sysfs_pm_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct kobject *kobj)
>> 	if (!is_object_gt(kobj))
>> 		return;
>>
>> +	ret = sysfs_create_file(kobj, &dev_attr_rapl_pl1_freq_mhz.attr);
> The convention here is to create sysfs files only for platforms on which a
> feature (in this case RAPL PL1 freq) is supported.
>
> Also are we sure this is only available on MTL and XEHPSDV and not on DG2?
> Since generally a feature appears first on a platform and then is available
> for all successive products. If it's available on DG2 too then we can use
> something like:
>
> 	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
>
> See GRAPHICS_VER_FULL for various platforms in i915_pci.c.
I will check again for DG2.
>
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		drm_warn(&gt->i915->drm,
>> +			"failed to create gt%u rapl_pl1_freq_mhz sysfs(%pe)",
>> +			gt->info.id, ERR_PTR(ret));
>> +
>> +
>> 	ret = sysfs_create_file(kobj, &dev_attr_punit_req_freq_mhz.attr);
>> 	if (ret)
>> 		drm_warn(&gt->i915->drm,
>> 			 "failed to create gt%u punit_req_freq_mhz sysfs (%pe)",
>> 			 gt->info.id, ERR_PTR(ret));
>>
>> +
> Remove empty line.
>
>> 	if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(intel_gt_perf_limit_reasons_reg(gt))) {
>> 		ret = sysfs_create_files(kobj, throttle_reason_attrs);
>> 		if (ret)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> index 17b40b625e31..0e89b941e3be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>
>>   #include "i915_drv.h"
>>   #include "i915_irq.h"
>> +#include "i915_reg.h"
> Not needed, see below.
>
>>   #include "intel_breadcrumbs.h"
>>   #include "intel_gt.h"
>>   #include "intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
>> @@ -2422,6 +2423,49 @@ bool rps_read_mask_mmio(struct intel_rps *rps,
>> 	return rps_read_mmio(rps, reg32) & mask;
>>   }
>>
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
>> +	i915_reg_t rgadr;
>> +	u32 rapl_pl1;
>> +
>> +	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915)) {
>> +		rgadr = MTL_RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT;
>> +	} else if (IS_XEHPSDV(i915)) {
>> +		rgadr = XEHPSDV_RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT;
>> +	} else {
>> +		MISSING_CASE(GRAPHICS_VER(i915));
>> +		rgadr = INVALID_MMIO_REG;
> No need for this, the sysfs file will only be visible for platforms on
> which this is supported so this will never be hit.
>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!i915_mmio_reg_valid(rgadr))
>> +		rapl_pl1 = 0;
> No need for this either.
>
>> +	else
>> +		rapl_pl1 = rps_read_mmio(rps, rgadr);
>> +
>> +	return rapl_pl1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_rapl(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rapl_pl1)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
>> +	u32 rapl = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (IS_METEORLAKE(i915) || IS_XEHPSDV(i915))
>> +		rapl = rapl_pl1 & RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT_MASK;
>> +	else
>> +		MISSING_CASE(GRAPHICS_VER(i915));
> No need for this either.
>
>> +
>> +	return rapl;
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> +	u32 rapl_freq = intel_rps_get_rapl(rps, intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1(rps));
>> +
>> +	return (rapl_freq >> 8) * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> Use REG_FIELD_GET to extract the freq.
>
> There doesn't seem any need to have 3 functions here, let's combine them
> into a single function and use REG_FIELD_GET.
Got it. Will fix this
>
>> +}
>> +
>>   /* External interface for intel_ips.ko */
>>
>>   static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> index 4509dfdc52e0..4adc6aaedba0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
>>   int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val);
>>   int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val);
>>   u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat1);
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_rapl(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rapl_pl1);
>>   u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_rapl_pl1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
> These should be static and not in the .h file. Anyway I think as pointed
> out above these 3 functions should probably be combined into just one.
>
>>   void gen6_rps_get_freq_caps(struct intel_rps *rps, struct intel_rps_freq_caps *caps);
>>   void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
>>   void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 5003a5ffbc6a..68ff98e27b8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -1818,6 +1818,10 @@
>>   #define   GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS_LOG_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 16)
>>   #define MTL_MEDIA_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS	_MMIO(0x138030)
>>
>> +#define XEHPSDV_RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT	_MMIO(0x250070)
>> +#define MTL_RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT	_MMIO(0x281070)
>> +#define RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT_MASK	0xffff
> Use REG_GENMASK(15, 0) here.
>
> Also:
> * The registers now need to be sorted by offset. Let's move these #defines
>    to gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> * RAPL_PL1_FREQ_LIMIT_MASK will need to be indented a couple of spaces as
>    done for other registers
Sure will move it to that file.
>>   #define CHV_CLK_CTL1			_MMIO(0x101100)
>>   #define VLV_CLK_CTL2			_MMIO(0x101104)
>>   #define   CLK_CTL2_CZCOUNT_30NS_SHIFT	28
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh

Thank you for the review

-Suja



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list