[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 20/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Async vm_unbind support
Niranjana Vishwanathapura
niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com
Tue Nov 15 23:15:03 UTC 2022
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:33:47AM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 04:20:54PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>On 15/11/2022 16:15, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>>On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:05:21AM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>>On 13/11/2022 07:57, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>>>>Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
>>>>>Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
>>>>>async unbind or if async unbind fails.
>>>>>
>>>>>No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
>>>>>handle all sequencing and user need not try to sequence any
>>>>>operation with the unbind completion.
>>>>>
>>>>>v2: use i915_vma_destroy_async in vm_unbind ioctl
>>>>>
>>>>>Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura
>>>>><niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>>This only does it for non-partial vma, right? Or was that
>>>>changed somewhere?
>>>>
>>>
>>>No, it applies to any vma (partial or non-partial).
>>>It was so from the beginning.
>>
>>Doesn't __i915_vma_unbind_async() return an error when mm.pages !=
>>vma->pages? IIRC this was discussed before. Just trying to think
>>about the consequences of this change.
>
>I am not seeing any such restriction. Let me probe and check if there
>is any such restriction anywhere in the call chain.
I checked and I am not seeing any restriction anywher in the call chain.
Niranjana
>
>Niranjana
>
>>
>>>
>>>Niranjana
>>>
>>>>Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>>>---
>>>>> .../drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 1 +
>>>>> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 3 +-
>>>>> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>diff --git
>>>>>a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>>>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>>>>>index d87d1210365b..36651b447966 100644
>>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>>>>>@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int i915_gem_vm_unbind_vma(struct
>>>>>i915_address_space *vm,
>>>>> */
>>>>> obj = vma->obj;
>>>>> i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
>>>>>- i915_vma_destroy(vma);
>>>>>+ i915_vma_destroy_async(vma);
>>>>> i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
>>>>> i915_gem_object_put(obj);
>>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>>>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>>>>>index 7cf77c67d755..483d25f2425c 100644
>>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>>>>>@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>>>>> #include "i915_vma.h"
>>>>> #include "i915_vma_resource.h"
>>>>>+static struct dma_fence *__i915_vma_unbind_async(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>>>>+
>>>>> static inline void assert_vma_held_evict(const struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /*
>>>>>@@ -1713,7 +1715,7 @@ void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>> spin_unlock_irq(>->closed_lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>>-static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>>+static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
>>>>> return;
>>>>>@@ -1727,7 +1729,21 @@ static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>> i915_vma_set_purged(vma);
>>>>> atomic_and(~I915_VMA_PIN_MASK, &vma->flags);
>>>>>- WARN_ON(__i915_vma_unbind(vma));
>>>>>+ if (async) {
>>>>>+ struct dma_fence *fence;
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ fence = __i915_vma_unbind_async(vma);
>>>>>+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
>>>>>+ async = false;
>>>>>+ } else {
>>>>>+ dma_resv_add_fence(vma->obj->base.resv, fence,
>>>>>+ DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
>>>>>+ dma_fence_put(fence);
>>>>>+ }
>>>>>+ }
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ if (!async)
>>>>>+ WARN_ON(__i915_vma_unbind(vma));
>>>>> GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
>>>>> }
>>>>>@@ -1787,7 +1803,7 @@ void i915_vma_destroy_locked(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>> {
>>>>> lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
>>>>>- force_unbind(vma);
>>>>>+ force_unbind(vma, false);
>>>>> list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
>>>>> release_references(vma, vma->vm->gt, false);
>>>>> }
>>>>>@@ -1798,7 +1814,34 @@ void i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>> bool vm_ddestroy;
>>>>> mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>>>>>- force_unbind(vma);
>>>>>+ force_unbind(vma, false);
>>>>>+ list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
>>>>>+ vm_ddestroy = vma->vm_ddestroy;
>>>>>+ vma->vm_ddestroy = false;
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ /* vma->vm may be freed when releasing vma->vm->mutex. */
>>>>>+ gt = vma->vm->gt;
>>>>>+ mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>>>>>+ release_references(vma, gt, vm_ddestroy);
>>>>>+}
>>>>>+
>>>>>+void i915_vma_destroy_async(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>>>>+{
>>>>>+ bool vm_ddestroy, async = vma->obj->mm.rsgt;
>>>>>+ struct intel_gt *gt;
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ if (dma_resv_reserve_fences(vma->obj->base.resv, 1))
>>>>>+ async = false;
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>>>>>+ /*
>>>>>+ * Ensure any asynchronous binding is complete while using
>>>>>+ * async unbind as we will be releasing the vma here.
>>>>>+ */
>>>>>+ if (async && i915_active_wait(&vma->active))
>>>>>+ async = false;
>>>>>+
>>>>>+ force_unbind(vma, async);
>>>>> list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
>>>>> vm_ddestroy = vma->vm_ddestroy;
>>>>> vma->vm_ddestroy = false;
>>>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
>>>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
>>>>>index 737ef310d046..25f15965dab8 100644
>>>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
>>>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
>>>>>@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>>>> void i915_vma_destroy_locked(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>>>> void i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>>>>+void i915_vma_destroy_async(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>>>> #define assert_vma_held(vma)
>>>>>dma_resv_assert_held((vma)->obj->base.resv)
>>>>>diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>index e5600f358a15..431d40bb1dee 100644
>>>>>--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>@@ -3969,7 +3969,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_vm_bind {
>>>>> * any error.
>>>>> *
>>>>> * VM_BIND/UNBIND ioctl calls executed on different CPU
>>>>>threads concurrently
>>>>>- * are not ordered.
>>>>>+ * are not ordered. Furthermore, parts of the VM_UNBIND
>>>>>operation can be done
>>>>>+ * asynchronously.
>>>>> */
>>>>> struct drm_i915_gem_vm_unbind {
>>>>> /** @vm_id: VM (address space) id to bind */
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list