[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/26] drm/i915/gt: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions
Paul Cercueil
paul at crapouillou.net
Mon Nov 7 20:59:55 UTC 2022
Hi Rodrigo,
Le lun. 7 nov. 2022 à 15:31:49 -0500, Rodrigo Vivi
<rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 05:55:10PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Instead of defining two versions of intel_sysfs_rc6_init(), one for
>> each
>> value of CONFIG_PM, add a check on !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) early in
>> the
>> function. This will allow the compiler to automatically drop the
>> dead
>> code when CONFIG_PM is disabled, without having to use #ifdef
>> guards.
>
> Making the RC6 to depend on the CONFIG_PM is probably an historical
> mistake and probably the right solution is simply to remove that
> dependency.
I don't know anything about i915, so the best I can do is update the
code without changing the functionality.
Then someone with a better understanding can send a patch to remove the
check on CONFIG_PM.
Cheers,
-Paul
>>
>> This has the advantage of always compiling these functions in,
>> independently of any Kconfig option. Thanks to that, bugs and other
>> regressions are subsequently easier to catch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul at crapouillou.net>
>> ---
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c | 8 +-------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> index 2b5f05b31187..decf892a4508 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c
>> @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ sysfs_gt_attribute_r_func(struct kobject *kobj,
>> struct attribute *attr,
>> NULL); \
>> INTEL_GT_ATTR_RO(_name)
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> static u32 get_residency(struct intel_gt *gt, i915_reg_t reg)
>> {
>> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>> @@ -300,7 +299,7 @@ static void intel_sysfs_rc6_init(struct
>> intel_gt *gt, struct kobject *kobj)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (!HAS_RC6(gt->i915))
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) || !HAS_RC6(gt->i915))
>> return;
>>
>> ret = __intel_gt_sysfs_create_group(kobj, rc6_attr_group);
>> @@ -329,11 +328,6 @@ static void intel_sysfs_rc6_init(struct
>> intel_gt *gt, struct kobject *kobj)
>> gt->info.id, ERR_PTR(ret));
>> }
>> }
>> -#else
>> -static void intel_sysfs_rc6_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct
>> kobject *kobj)
>> -{
>> -}
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>>
>> static u32 __act_freq_mhz_show(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list