[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/gvt: switch from track_flush_slot to track_remove_slot

Sean Christopherson seanjc at google.com
Fri Nov 11 17:07:35 UTC 2022


On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Yan Zhao wrote:
> KVMGT only cares about when a slot is indeed removed.
> So switch to use track_remove_slot which is called when a slot is removed.

This should capture the original motivation, i.e. that the existing
->track_flush_slot() hook is theoretically flawed.  I think it also makes sense
to call out that KVMGT undoubtedly does the wrong thing if a memslot is moved,
but that (a) KVMGT has never supported moving memslots and (b) there's no sane
use case for moving memslots that might be used by the guest for the GTT.

Bonus points if you can figure out a way to capture the restriction in the docs,
e.g. somewhere in gpu/i915.rst?

Lastly, provide a link to the original discussion which provides even more context.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221108084416.11447-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com

> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw at linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao at intel.com>
> ---


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list