[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dmc: Update DG2 DMC version to v2.08

[Srivatsa, Anusha]

Thanks, looked at the rest of the platforms in the file and the changes look good.

Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sousa, Gustavo <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:06 AM
> To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>; intel-
> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dmc: Update DG2 DMC version
> to v2.08
> 
> Hi, Anusha.
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:27:05PM -0300, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf
> > > Of Gustavo Sousa
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 4:14 AM
> > > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dmc: Update DG2 DMC version
> > > to
> > > v2.08
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > > 1. Fixes for Register noclaims and few restore.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2:
> > >   - Use correct numbering for the minor version (8 instead of the
> > >     invalid octal 08).
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > index 081a4d0083b1..eff3add70611 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
> > >
> > >  #define DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> 	ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> > >
> > > -#define DG2_DMC_PATH			DMC_PATH(dg2, 2, 07)
> > > -#define DG2_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED	DMC_VERSION(2, 07)
> > > +#define DG2_DMC_PATH			DMC_PATH(dg2, 2, 08)
> > > +#define DG2_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED	DMC_VERSION(2, 8)
> > 							^^^^^this should be
> (2,08)
> 
> The v1 was using 08, but the problem is that this value is interpreted as a bad
> octal, and that caused the compiler to rightfully complain about it :-).
> 
> While the path should contain the "08", I believe the version required must
> contain valid numbers and we should represent them in the decimal base.
> There are other similar examples in this file.
> 
> --
> Gustavo Sousa