[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/gsc: Do a driver-FLR on unload if GSC was loaded
Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Tue Nov 22 22:50:17 UTC 2022
On 11/22/2022 12:46 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:16:15PM -0800, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> If the GSC was loaded, the only way to stop it during the driver unload
>> flow is to do a driver-FLR.
>> The driver-FLR is not the same as PCI config space FLR in that
>> it doesn't reset the SGUnit and doesn't modify the PCI config
>> space. Thus, it doesn't require a re-enumeration of the PCI BARs.
>> However, the driver-FLR does cause a memory wipe of graphics memory
>> on all discrete GPU platforms or a wipe limited to stolen memory
>> on the integrated GPU platforms.
> Nothing major or blocking, but a few thoughts:
>
> 1. Should we document this in the code, at least in a comment in the
> flr function?
Sure, I'll add it in
> 2. Should we call this driver_initiated_flr, aiming to reduce even more
> the ambiguity of it?
ok
>
>> We perform the FLR as the last action before releasing the MMIO bar, so
>> that we don't have to care about the consequences of the reset on the
>> unload flow.
> 3. should we try to implement this already in the gt_reset case as the
> last resrouce before wedging the gt? So we can already test this flow
> in the current platforms?
This would be nice to have, but very complicated to implement. The fact
that FLR kills everything on the system, including resetting display and
wiping LMEM, means that we would need a new recovery path to
re-initialize all components. There are also potential questions on how
to handle LMEM: do we try to migrate it to SMEM before triggering the
FLR (potentially via CPU memcpy if the GT is dead), or do we just let it
get wiped?
The reason why I wanted the FLR to be the very last thing before
releasing MMIO access was exactly to not have to care about the recovery
path ;)
Daniele
>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c | 9 +++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 13 +++++++
>> 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
>> index 510fb47193ec..5dad3c19c445 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
>> @@ -173,6 +173,15 @@ int intel_gsc_fw_upload(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
>> if (err)
>> goto fail;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Once the GSC FW is loaded, the only way to kill it on driver unload
>> + * is to do a driver FLR. Given this is a very disruptive action, we
>> + * want to do it as the last action before releasing the access to the
>> + * MMIO bar, which means we need to do it as part of the primary uncore
>> + * cleanup.
>> + */
>> + intel_uncore_set_flr_on_fini(>->i915->uncore);
>> +
>> /* FW is not fully operational until we enable SW proxy */
>> intel_uc_fw_change_status(gsc_fw, INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_TRANSFERRED);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 8e1892d14774..60e55245200b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@
>>
>> #define GU_CNTL _MMIO(0x101010)
>> #define LMEM_INIT REG_BIT(7)
>> +#define DRIVERFLR REG_BIT(31)
>> +#define GU_DEBUG _MMIO(0x101018)
>> +#define DRIVERFLR_STATUS REG_BIT(31)
>>
>> #define GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED _MMIO(0x1082C0)
>> #define GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK (0xFFF << 20)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> index 8006a6c61466..c1befa33ff59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> @@ -2703,6 +2703,48 @@ void intel_uncore_prune_engine_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void driver_flr(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore->i915;
>> + const unsigned int flr_timeout_ms = 3000; /* specs recommend a 3s wait */
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Triggering Driver-FLR\n");
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Make sure any pending FLR requests have cleared by waiting for the
>> + * FLR trigger bit to go to zero. Also clear GU_DEBUG's DRIVERFLR_STATUS
>> + * to make sure it's not still set from a prior attempt (it's a write to
>> + * clear bit).
>> + * Note that we should never be in a situation where a previous attempt
>> + * is still pending (unless the HW is totally dead), but better to be
>> + * safe in case something unexpected happens
>> + */
>> + ret = intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore, GU_CNTL, DRIVERFLR, 0, flr_timeout_ms);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + drm_err(&i915->drm,
>> + "Failed to wait for Driver-FLR bit to clear! %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
>> +
>> + /* Trigger the actual Driver-FLR */
>> + intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, GU_CNTL, 0, DRIVERFLR);
>> +
>> + ret = intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore, GU_DEBUG,
>> + DRIVERFLR_STATUS, DRIVERFLR_STATUS,
>> + flr_timeout_ms);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "wait for Driver-FLR completion failed! %d\n", ret);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
>> +
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Called via drm-managed action */
>> void intel_uncore_fini_mmio(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
>> {
>> @@ -2716,6 +2758,9 @@ void intel_uncore_fini_mmio(struct drm_device *dev, void *data)
>> intel_uncore_fw_domains_fini(uncore);
>> iosf_mbi_punit_release();
>> }
>> +
>> + if (intel_uncore_needs_flr_on_fini(uncore))
>> + driver_flr(uncore);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>> index 5449146a0624..a9fa0b11e7e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
>> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ struct intel_uncore {
>> #define UNCORE_HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED BIT(1)
>> #define UNCORE_HAS_DBG_UNCLAIMED BIT(2)
>> #define UNCORE_HAS_FIFO BIT(3)
>> +#define UNCORE_NEEDS_FLR_ON_FINI BIT(3)
>>
>> const struct intel_forcewake_range *fw_domains_table;
>> unsigned int fw_domains_table_entries;
>> @@ -223,6 +224,18 @@ intel_uncore_has_fifo(const struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>> return uncore->flags & UNCORE_HAS_FIFO;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool
>> +intel_uncore_needs_flr_on_fini(const struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>> +{
>> + return uncore->flags & UNCORE_NEEDS_FLR_ON_FINI;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool
>> +intel_uncore_set_flr_on_fini(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>> +{
>> + return uncore->flags |= UNCORE_NEEDS_FLR_ON_FINI;
>> +}
>> +
>> void intel_uncore_mmio_debug_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> void intel_uncore_init_early(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>> struct intel_gt *gt);
>> --
>> 2.37.3
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list