[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Standardize auto-increment LUT load procedure

[Ville Syrjala]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Various gamma units on various platforms have some problems loading
the LUT index and auto-increment bit at the same time. We have to
do this in two steps. The first known case was the glk degamma LUT,
but at least ADL has another known case.

We're not going to suffer too badly from a couple of extra register
writes here, so let's just standardize on this practice for all
auto-increment LUT loads/reads. This way we never have to worry about
this specific issue again. And for good measure always reset the
index back to zero at the end (we already did this in a few places).

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
index c960c2aaf328..bd7e781d9d07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
@@ -934,6 +934,8 @@ static void bdw_load_lut_10(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	int i, lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob);
 	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
 
+	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
+			  prec_index);
 	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
 			  PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT |
 			  prec_index);
@@ -1138,7 +1140,10 @@ icl_program_gamma_superfine_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	 * 2/(8 * 128 * 256) ... 8/(8 * 128 * 256).
 	 */
 	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
-			    PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
+			    PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_VALUE(0));
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
+			    PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT |
+			    PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_VALUE(0));
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
 		const struct drm_color_lut *entry = &lut[i];
@@ -1148,6 +1153,9 @@ icl_program_gamma_superfine_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe),
 					    ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
 	}
+
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
+			    PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_VALUE(0));
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1170,6 +1178,8 @@ icl_program_gamma_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	 * PAL_PREC_INDEX[0] and PAL_PREC_INDEX[1] map to seg2[1],
 	 * seg2[0] being unused by the hardware.
 	 */
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
+			    PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
 	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
 			    PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT |
 			    PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
@@ -1202,6 +1212,9 @@ icl_program_gamma_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 					    ilk_lut_12p4_udw(entry));
 	}
 
+	intel_dsb_reg_write(crtc_state, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
+			    PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
+
 	/* The last entry in the LUT is to be programmed in GCMAX */
 	entry = &lut[256 * 8 * 128];
 	ivb_load_lut_max(crtc_state, entry);
@@ -2819,6 +2832,8 @@ static struct drm_property_blob *bdw_read_lut_10(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 
 	lut = blob->data;
 
+	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
+			  prec_index);
 	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe),
 			  PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT |
 			  prec_index);
@@ -2947,6 +2962,8 @@ icl_read_lut_multi_segment(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 
 	lut = blob->data;
 
+	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
+			  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_VALUE(0));
 	intel_de_write_fw(i915, PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe),
 			  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_AUTO_INCREMENT |
 			  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_VALUE(0));
-- 
2.37.4