[Intel-gfx] 回复: 回复: [PATCH v4] drm: Optimise for continuous memory allocation

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue Nov 29 13:42:55 UTC 2022


Am 29.11.22 um 14:14 schrieb Pan, Xinhui:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> comments line.
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
> 发送时间: 2022年11月29日 20:07
> 收件人: Pan, Xinhui; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> 抄送: daniel at ffwll.ch; matthew.auld at intel.com; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> 主题: Re: 回复: [PATCH v4] drm: Optimise for continuous memory allocation
>
> Am 29.11.22 um 12:54 schrieb Pan, Xinhui:
>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>
>> comments inline.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> 发件人: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
>> 发送时间: 2022年11月29日 19:32
>> 收件人: Pan, Xinhui; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> 抄送: daniel at ffwll.ch; matthew.auld at intel.com; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> 主题: Re: [PATCH v4] drm: Optimise for continuous memory allocation
>>
>> Am 29.11.22 um 11:56 schrieb xinhui pan:
>>> Currently drm-buddy does not have full knowledge of continuous memory.
>>>
>>> Lets consider scenario below.
>>> order 1:    L             R
>>> order 0: LL   LR      RL      RR
>>> for order 1 allocation, it can offer L or R or LR+RL.
>>>
>>> For now, we only implement L or R case for continuous memory allocation.
>>> So this patch aims to implement the rest cases.
>>>
>>> Adding a new member leaf_link which links all leaf blocks in asceding
>>> order. Now we can find more than 2 sub-order blocks easier.
>>> Say, order 4 can be combined with corresponding order 4, 2+2, 1+2+1,
>>> 0+1+2+0, 0+2+1+0.
>> Well that description is a bit confusing and doesn't make to much sense
>> to me.
>>
>> When you have two adjacent free order 0 blocks then those should be
>> automatically combined into an order 1. This is a fundamental property
>> of the buddy allocator, otherwise the whole algorithm won't work.
>>
>> [xh] sorry, The order above is not 4, should be 3.
>> order 3 can be combined with corresponding order 3, 2+2, 1+2+1, 0+1+2+0, 0+2+1+0
>> the order 0 + 1 + 2 + 0 case does not have two same order 0 adjacent. they are in different tree.
>> looks like below
>> order 3:                            L3                                               R3
>> order 2:            L2                              (R2)*                    L2*
>> order 1:    L1             (R1)                                         L1
>> order 0: L0   (R0)                                                 (L0)
>> R0 + R1+R2 +L0 with () around combined to be order 3.
>> R2 + L2 with * followed combined to be order 3.
>> etc....
>>
>> When you have the case of a free order 1 block with two adjacent free
>> order 0 blocks then we a fragmented address space. In this case the best
>> approach is to fail the allocation and start to swap things out.
>>
>> [xh] Eviction is expensive.
> No, it isn't. Eviction is part of the algorithm to clean this up.
>
> When we can't find any free room then evicting and moving things back in
> is the best we can do to de-fragment the address space.
>
> This is expected behavior.
>
> [xh]  I believe eviction is the best approach to cleanup memory.
> But as its cost is not cheap, it should be the final step.
> As long as we could find any room to satisfy the request, no need to trigger eviction.
>
> Just a test in theory
> two threads run parallelly.
> total memory is 128.
> while true {
> alloc 32
> alloc 32
> free 32
> free 32
> alloc 64
> free 64
> }
>
> when thread 0 wants to alloc 64, the memory layout might be
> (32) means allocated, _32_ means free.
> case 1: (32) _32_ _32_ (32)
> case 2: (32) _32_ (32) _32_
> case 3: (32) (32)  _64_
> case 4: (32) _32_ 64_
> case 5: _128_
> case 6: (64) _64_
>
> without this patch, it would trigger eviction in case 1 and case 2.
> with this patch, it would trigger eviction only in case 2.
> obviously, the two threads totally consume memory at most 128 at any time, no overcommit.
> The eviction is the less the better.

No, once more: Eviction is part of why this works as it should.

In other words eviction is expected here and de-fragments the address 
space into larger blocks.

This patch here breaks the general approach of the buddy allocator and 
is a no-go as far as I can see.

If looking at adjacent blocks would come without extra cost then we 
could consider it, but this here means extra overhead and complexity.

Regards,
Christian.

>
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> And if it still fails to find the continuous memory with this approach, then let's evict.
>>
>> So what exactly is the goal here?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> change from v3:
>>> reworked totally. adding leaf_link.
>>>
>>> change from v2:
>>> search continuous block in nearby root if needed
>>>
>>> change from v1:
>>> implement top-down continuous allocation
>>> ---
>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>     include/drm/drm_buddy.h     |   1 +
>>>     2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>>> index 11bb59399471..8edafb99b02c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ int drm_buddy_init(struct drm_buddy *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
>>>     {
>>>         unsigned int i;
>>>         u64 offset;
>>> +     LIST_HEAD(leaf);
>>>
>>>         if (size < chunk_size)
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ int drm_buddy_init(struct drm_buddy *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
>>>                         goto out_free_roots;
>>>
>>>                 mark_free(mm, root);
>>> +             list_add_tail(&root->leaf_link, &leaf);
>>>
>>>                 BUG_ON(i > mm->max_order);
>>>                 BUG_ON(drm_buddy_block_size(mm, root) < chunk_size);
>>> @@ -147,6 +149,7 @@ int drm_buddy_init(struct drm_buddy *mm, u64 size, u64 chunk_size)
>>>                 i++;
>>>         } while (size);
>>>
>>> +     list_del(&leaf);
>>>         return 0;
>>>
>>>     out_free_roots:
>>> @@ -205,6 +208,9 @@ static int split_block(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>>         mark_free(mm, block->left);
>>>         mark_free(mm, block->right);
>>>
>>> +     list_add(&block->right->leaf_link, &block->leaf_link);
>>> +     list_add(&block->left->leaf_link, &block->leaf_link);
>>> +     list_del(&block->leaf_link);
>>>         mark_split(block);
>>>
>>>         return 0;
>>> @@ -256,6 +262,9 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>>                         break;
>>>
>>>                 list_del(&buddy->link);
>>> +             list_add(&parent->leaf_link, &block->leaf_link);
>>> +             list_del(&buddy->leaf_link);
>>> +             list_del(&block->leaf_link);
>>>
>>>                 drm_block_free(mm, block);
>>>                 drm_block_free(mm, buddy);
>>> @@ -386,6 +395,78 @@ alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>>         return ERR_PTR(err);
>>>     }
>>>
>>> +static struct drm_buddy_block *
>>> +find_continuous_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>> +                    int order,
>>> +                    unsigned long flags,
>>> +                    struct drm_buddy_block **rblock)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct list_head *head = &mm->free_list[order];
>>> +     struct drm_buddy_block *free_block, *max_block = NULL, *end, *begin;
>>> +     u64 pages = BIT(order + 1);
>>> +     u64 cur_pages;
>>> +
>>> +     list_for_each_entry(free_block, head, link) {
>>> +             if (max_block) {
>>> +                     if (!(flags & DRM_BUDDY_TOPDOWN_ALLOCATION))
>>> +                             break;
>>> +
>>> +                     if (drm_buddy_block_offset(free_block) <
>>> +                         drm_buddy_block_offset(max_block))
>>> +                             continue;
>>> +             }
>>> +
>>> +             cur_pages = BIT(order);
>>> +             begin = end = free_block;
>>> +             while (true) {
>>> +                     struct drm_buddy_block *prev, *next;
>>> +                     int prev_order, next_order;
>>> +
>>> +                     prev = list_prev_entry(begin, leaf_link);
>>> +                     if (!drm_buddy_block_is_free(prev) ||
>>> +                         drm_buddy_block_offset(prev) >
>>> +                         drm_buddy_block_offset(begin)) {
>>> +                             prev = NULL;
>>> +                     }
>>> +                     next = list_next_entry(end, leaf_link);
>>> +                     if (!drm_buddy_block_is_free(next) ||
>>> +                         drm_buddy_block_offset(next) <
>>> +                         drm_buddy_block_offset(end)) {
>>> +                             next = NULL;
>>> +                     }
>>> +                     if (!prev && !next)
>>> +                             break;
>>> +
>>> +                     prev_order = prev ? drm_buddy_block_order(prev) : -1;
>>> +                     next_order = next ? drm_buddy_block_order(next) : -1;
>>> +                     if (next_order >= prev_order) {
>>> +                             BUG_ON(drm_buddy_block_offset(end) +
>>> +                                    drm_buddy_block_size(mm, end) !=
>>> +                                    drm_buddy_block_offset(next));
>>> +                             end = next;
>>> +                             cur_pages += BIT(drm_buddy_block_order(next));
>>> +                     }
>>> +                     if (prev_order >= next_order) {
>>> +                             BUG_ON(drm_buddy_block_offset(prev) +
>>> +                                    drm_buddy_block_size(mm, prev) !=
>>> +                                    drm_buddy_block_offset(begin));
>>> +                             begin = prev;
>>> +                             cur_pages += BIT(drm_buddy_block_order(prev));
>>> +                     }
>>> +                     if (pages == cur_pages)
>>> +                             break;
>>> +                     BUG_ON(pages < cur_pages);
>>> +             }
>>> +
>>> +             if (pages > cur_pages)
>>> +                     continue;
>>> +
>>> +             *rblock = end;
>>> +             max_block = begin;
>>> +     }
>>> +     return max_block;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>     static struct drm_buddy_block *
>>>     get_maxblock(struct list_head *head)
>>>     {
>>> @@ -637,7 +718,7 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>>                            struct list_head *blocks,
>>>                            unsigned long flags)
>>>     {
>>> -     struct drm_buddy_block *block = NULL;
>>> +     struct drm_buddy_block *block = NULL, *rblock = NULL;
>>>         unsigned int min_order, order;
>>>         unsigned long pages;
>>>         LIST_HEAD(allocated);
>>> @@ -689,17 +770,30 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>>                                 break;
>>>
>>>                         if (order-- == min_order) {
>>> +                             if (!(flags & DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION) &&
>>> +                                 min_order != 0 && pages == BIT(order + 1)) {
>>> +                                     block = find_continuous_blocks(mm,
>>> +                                                                    order,
>>> +                                                                    flags,
>>> +                                                                    &rblock);
>>> +                                     if (block)
>>> +                                             break;
>>> +                             }
>>>                                 err = -ENOSPC;
>>>                                 goto err_free;
>>>                         }
>>>                 } while (1);
>>>
>>> -             mark_allocated(block);
>>> -             mm->avail -= drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
>>> -             kmemleak_update_trace(block);
>>> -             list_add_tail(&block->link, &allocated);
>>> -
>>> -             pages -= BIT(order);
>>> +             do {
>>> +                     mark_allocated(block);
>>> +                     mm->avail -= drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
>>> +                     kmemleak_update_trace(block);
>>> +                     list_add_tail(&block->link, &allocated);
>>> +                     pages -= BIT(drm_buddy_block_order(block));
>>> +                     if (block == rblock || !rblock)
>>> +                             break;
>>> +                     block = list_next_entry(block, leaf_link);
>>> +             } while (true);
>>>
>>>                 if (!pages)
>>>                         break;
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>>> index 572077ff8ae7..c5437bd4f4f3 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct drm_buddy_block {
>>>          */
>>>         struct list_head link;
>>>         struct list_head tmp_link;
>>> +     struct list_head leaf_link;
>>>     };
>>>
>>>     /* Order-zero must be at least PAGE_SIZE */



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list