[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 04/16] drm/i915/perf: Determine gen12 oa ctx offset at runtime
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com
Thu Oct 13 17:05:21 UTC 2022
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 04:46:07PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:27:27 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>>
>> +static u32 oa_context_image_offset(struct intel_context *ce, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + u32 offset, len = (ce->engine->context_size - PAGE_SIZE) / 4;
>> + u32 *state = ce->lrc_reg_state;
>> +
>> + for (offset = 0; offset < len; ) {
>> + if (IS_MI_LRI_CMD(state[offset])) {
>> + /*
>> + * We expect reg-value pairs in MI_LRI command, so
>> + * MI_LRI_LEN() should be even, if not, issue a warning.
>> + */
>> + drm_WARN_ON(&ce->engine->i915->drm,
>> + MI_LRI_LEN(state[offset]) & 0x1);
>> +
>> + if (oa_find_reg_in_lri(state, reg, &offset, len))
>> + break;
>> + } else {
>> + offset++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Note that the the reg value is written to 'offset + 1' location, so
>> + * ensure that the offset is less than (len - 1).
>> + */
>> + return offset < len ? offset : U32_MAX;
>
>Should this then be 'offset < len - 1'? It is actually equivalent since
>length is even and we do idx += 2 in oa_find_reg_in_lri so 'offset < len'
>is the same as 'offset < len - 1' but since we mention (len - 1) in the
>comment maybe clearer to use 'offset < len - 1'?
I was experimenting with len - 1, but removed it later. Forgot to remove
the comment. I will drop the comment.
Thanks,
Umesh
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list