[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/ttm: rework on ttm_resource to use size_t type
Matthew Auld
matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Tue Oct 25 16:57:42 UTC 2022
On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 16:51, Somalapuram Amaranath
<Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com> wrote:
>
> Change ttm_resource structure from num_pages to size_t size in bytes.
> v1 -> v2: change PFN_UP(dst_mem->size) to ttm->num_pages
> v1 -> v2: change bo->resource->size to bo->base.size at some places
> v1 -> v2: remove the local variable
> v1 -> v2: cleanup cmp_size_smaller_first()
>
> Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_res_cursor.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_trace.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo0039.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo5039.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo74c1.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo85b5.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo9039.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo90b5.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_boa0b5.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 7 +++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_trace.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 14 ++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_blit.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_cotable.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_page_dirty.c | 6 +++---
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h | 4 ++--
> 38 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> index 38119311284d..f86dc92965bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> page_last = vma_pages(vma) + vma->vm_pgoff -
> drm_vma_node_start(&bo->base.vma_node);
>
> - if (unlikely(page_offset >= bo->resource->num_pages))
> + if (unlikely(page_offset >= bo->base.size))
At a glance it looks like we are missing PFN_UP(bo->base.size) for this one?
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list