[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix sg_table handling in map_dma_buf
Ruhl, Michael J
michael.j.ruhl at intel.com
Fri Oct 28 13:55:19 UTC 2022
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>Matthew Auld
>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:27 AM
>To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dmabuf: fix sg_table handling in
>map_dma_buf
>
>We need to iterate over the original entries here for the sg_table,
>pulling out the struct page for each one, to be remapped. However
>currently this incorrectly iterates over the final dma mapped entries,
>which is likely just one gigantic sg entry if the iommu is enabled,
>leading to us only mapping the first struct page (and any physically
>contiguous pages following it), even if there is potentially lots more
>data to follow.
>
>Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7306
>Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>index 07eee1c09aaf..05ebbdfd3b3b 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct
>dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> goto err;
> }
>
>- ret = sg_alloc_table(st, obj->mm.pages->nents, GFP_KERNEL);
>+ ret = sg_alloc_table(st, obj->mm.pages->orig_nents, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret)
> goto err_free;
>
> src = obj->mm.pages->sgl;
> dst = st->sgl;
>- for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.pages->nents; i++) {
>+ for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.pages->orig_nents; i++) {
This really should use the for_each_sg() macro.
I proposed a clean up patch a while back that looked like this:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
index e2cdc2640c08..ccc5d46aa749 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/dma-resv.h>
+#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include "gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
@@ -41,12 +42,10 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
if (ret)
goto err_free;
- src = obj->mm.pages->sgl;
dst = sgt->sgl;
- for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.pages->nents; i++) {
+ for_each_sg(obj->mm.pages->sgl, src, obj->mm.pages->nents, i) {
sg_set_page(dst, sg_page(src), src->length, 0);
dst = sg_next(dst);
- src = sg_next(src);
}
If you are updating the for loop, this might be a reasonable update as well.
Mike
> sg_set_page(dst, sg_page(src), src->length, 0);
> dst = sg_next(dst);
> src = sg_next(src);
>--
>2.37.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list