[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/mtl: don't expose GSC command streamer to the user

[Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele]

On 10/27/2022 8:40 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:15:54PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> There is no userspace user for this CS yet, we only need it for internal
>> kernel ops (e.g. HuC, PXP), so don't expose it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Since we never expose it to userspace, we also never get to the point of
> doing an engine rename and removing the apostrophe.  I assume we're okay
> with this engine continuing to show up as "other'6" in debug logs?

I don't think it matters a lot in debug logs, but anyway it wouldn't be 
hard to rename it to something different. What do you suggest to rename 
it to? Since OTHER_CLASS doesn't have a uabi_class defined we can't use 
a count of engines of that type like we do for the other classes. Just 
rename it straight to hardcoded gsc0 ?

Daniele

>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
>> index 79312b734690..ca795daca116 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
>> @@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ void intel_engines_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>   		if (intel_gt_has_unrecoverable_error(engine->gt))
>>   			continue; /* ignore incomplete engines */
>>   
>> +		/* don't expose GSC engine to user */
>> +		if (engine->class == OTHER_CLASS)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>>   		GEM_BUG_ON(engine->class >= ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_classes));
>>   		engine->uabi_class = uabi_classes[engine->class];
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.37.3
>>