[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 17/21] dma-buf: Move dma_buf_map_attachment() to dynamic locking specification

[Christian König]

Am 31.08.22 um 17:37 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
> Move dma-buf attachment mapping functions to the dynamic locking
> specification by asserting that the reservation lock is held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko at collabora.com>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>

> ---
>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 10 ++--------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 073942bf5ae9..8e928fe6e8df 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -1037,8 +1037,7 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>   	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf))
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>   
> -	if (dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach))
> -		dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> +	dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>   
>   	if (attach->sgt) {
>   		/*
> @@ -1053,7 +1052,6 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>   	}
>   
>   	if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) {
> -		dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>   		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY)) {
>   			r = attach->dmabuf->ops->pin(attach);
>   			if (r)
> @@ -1142,15 +1140,11 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>   	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
>   		return;
>   
> -	if (dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach))
> -		dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> +	dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>   
>   	if (attach->sgt == sg_table)
>   		return;
>   
> -	if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
> -		dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
> -
>   	__unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
>   
>   	if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf) &&