[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for damage clips handling
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 13 09:04:18 UTC 2022
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:29:16PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Currently damage clips handling is broken for planes when using big
> framebuffer + offset in case kms driver adjusts drm_plane_state.src
> coords. This is because damage clips are using coords relative to
> original coords from user-space.
>
> This patchset is fixing this by using original
> coords from user-space instead of drm_plane_state.src when iterating
> damage_clips.
>
> v2: Modify drm unit tests accordingly
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: Maíra Canal <mairacanal at riseup.net>
>
> Jouni Högander (4):
> drm: Use original src rect while initializing damage iterator
> drm/i915/display: Use original src in psr2 sel fetch area calculation
> drm/i915/display: Use drm helper instead of own loop for damage clips
> drm/tests: Set also mock plane src_x, src_y, src_w and src_h
Do these need to be applied into the same tree, or can
the drm vs. i915 stuff go in separately?
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c | 11 ++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 20 +++++++------------
> .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list