[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for damage clips handling

Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann at suse.de
Tue Sep 13 10:56:49 UTC 2022



Am 13.09.22 um 12:54 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
> 
> Am 13.09.22 um 12:47 schrieb Hogander, Jouni:
>> On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 12:04 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:29:16PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
>>>> Currently damage clips handling is broken for planes when using big
>>>> framebuffer + offset in case kms driver adjusts drm_plane_state.src
>>>> coords. This is because damage clips are using coords relative to
>>>> original coords from user-space.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is fixing this by using original
>>>> coords from user-space instead of drm_plane_state.src when
>>>> iterating
>>>> damage_clips.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Modify drm unit tests accordingly
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Maíra Canal <mairacanal at riseup.net>
>>>>
>>>> Jouni Högander (4):
>>>>    drm: Use original src rect while initializing damage iterator
>>>>    drm/i915/display: Use original src in psr2 sel fetch area
>>>> calculation
>>>>    drm/i915/display: Use drm helper instead of own loop for damage
>>>> clips
>>>>    drm/tests: Set also mock plane src_x, src_y, src_w and src_h
>>>
>>> Do these need to be applied into the same tree, or can
>>> the drm vs. i915 stuff go in separately?
>>
>> Patch 1 and 2 are needed to fix that bigfb handling for i915. Patch 4
>> is also needed to prevent breaking tests. Patch 3 is more like cleanup.
>>
>> I think i915 patches could go via i915 tree. This just means that i915
>> bigfb handling isn't fixed by either of the sets alone.
> 
> I have a number of updates for damage handling that I want to get 
> reviewed soon. Could you please merge your patchset via drm-misc-next?

Or at least patches 1 and 4.

> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c           | 11 ++++++----
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 20 +++++++--------
>>>> ----
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_damage_helper_test.c    |  5 +++++
>>>>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20220913/0de2f645/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list