[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/uc: Update to latest GuC and use new-format GuC/HuC names
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Sep 15 08:59:29 UTC 2022
Hi,
On 15/09/2022 00:46, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>
> Going forwards, the intention is for GuC firmware files to be named
> for their major version only and HuC firmware files to have no version
> number in the name at all. This patch adds those entries for all
> platforms that are officially GuC/HuC enabled.
>
> Also, update the expected GuC version numbers to the latest firmware
> release for those platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
> index 1169e2a09da24..b91ad4aede1f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,14 @@ void intel_uc_fw_change_status(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw,
> * security fixes, etc. to be enabled.
> */
> #define INTEL_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(fw_def, guc_maj, guc_mmp) \
> - fw_def(DG2, 0, guc_mmp(dg2, 70, 4, 1)) \
> + fw_def(DG2, 0, guc_maj(dg2, 70, 5)) \
Just glancing over out of curiosity. Part which confused me is that if
only major is supposed to be used then what is the '5' in guc_maj(dg2,
70, 5) ?
I also couldn't find guc_maj with grep so I guess it's some sort of a
magic concatenation macro or what?
Regards,
Tvrtko
> + fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P, 0, guc_maj(adlp, 70, 5)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P, 0, guc_mmp(adlp, 70, 1, 1)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P, 0, guc_mmp(adlp, 69, 0, 3)) \
> + fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S, 0, guc_maj(tgl, 70, 5)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S, 0, guc_mmp(tgl, 70, 1, 1)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S, 0, guc_mmp(tgl, 69, 0, 3)) \
> - fw_def(DG1, 0, guc_mmp(dg1, 70, 1, 1)) \
> + fw_def(DG1, 0, guc_maj(dg1, 70, 5)) \
> fw_def(ROCKETLAKE, 0, guc_mmp(tgl, 70, 1, 1)) \
> fw_def(TIGERLAKE, 0, guc_mmp(tgl, 70, 1, 1)) \
> fw_def(JASPERLAKE, 0, guc_mmp(ehl, 70, 1, 1)) \
> @@ -92,9 +94,11 @@ void intel_uc_fw_change_status(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw,
> fw_def(SKYLAKE, 0, guc_mmp(skl, 70, 1, 1))
>
> #define INTEL_HUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(fw_def, huc_raw, huc_mmp) \
> + fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P, 0, huc_raw(tgl)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_P, 0, huc_mmp(tgl, 7, 9, 3)) \
> + fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S, 0, huc_raw(tgl)) \
> fw_def(ALDERLAKE_S, 0, huc_mmp(tgl, 7, 9, 3)) \
> - fw_def(DG1, 0, huc_mmp(dg1, 7, 9, 3)) \
> + fw_def(DG1, 0, huc_raw(dg1)) \
> fw_def(ROCKETLAKE, 0, huc_mmp(tgl, 7, 9, 3)) \
> fw_def(TIGERLAKE, 0, huc_mmp(tgl, 7, 9, 3)) \
> fw_def(JASPERLAKE, 0, huc_mmp(ehl, 9, 0, 0)) \
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list