[Intel-gfx] [topic/core-for-CI] Revert "iommu/dma: Fix race condition during iova_domain initialization"
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Sep 14 15:54:36 UTC 2022
On 2022-09-14 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 02:40:45PM +0200, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
>> This reverts commit ac9a5d522bb80be50ea84965699e1c8257d745ce.
>>
>> This change introduces a regression on Alder Lake that completely
>> blocks testing. To enable CI and avoid possible circular locking
>> warning, revert the patch.
>
> We are already on rc5. Are iommu authors involved aware of this issue?
> We could do this in our "for CI only" branch, but it's equally important
> that this is fixed for 6.0
>
> Cc'ing them.
The lockdep report doesn't make much sense to me - the deadlock cycle
it's reporting doesn't even involve the mutex added by that commit, and
otherwise the lock ordering between the IOMMU bus notifier(s) and
cpu_hotplug_lock has existed for ages. Has lockdep somehow got multiple
different and unrelated bus notifiers mixed up, maybe?
FWIW nobody else has reported anything, and that mutex addresses a
real-world concurrency issue, so I'm not convinced a revert is
appropriate without at least a much clearer justification.
Robin.
> thanks
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>> kernel log:
>>
>> ======================================================
>> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> 6.0.0-rc5-CI_DRM_12132-g6c93e979e542+ #1 Not tainted
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> cpuhp/0/15 is trying to acquire lock:
>> ffff8881013df278 (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at:
>> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x50
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> ffffffff826490c0 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x48/0x1f0
>> which lock already depends on the new loc
>> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>> -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}:
>> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0xa6/0x1f0
>> smpboot_thread_fn+0x1b5/0x260
>> kthread+0xed/0x120
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
>> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
>> __cpuhp_state_add_instance+0x43/0x1c0
>> iova_domain_init_rcaches+0x199/0x1c0
>> iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x130/0x440
>> bus_iommu_probe+0x26a/0x2d0
>> bus_set_iommu+0x82/0xd0
>> intel_iommu_init+0xe33/0x1039
>> pci_iommu_init+0x9/0x31
>> do_one_initcall+0x53/0x2f0
>> kernel_init_freeable+0x18f/0x1e1
>> kernel_init+0x11/0x120
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> -> #1 (&domain->iova_cookie->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
>> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
>> __mutex_lock+0x97/0xf10
>> iommu_setup_dma_ops+0xd7/0x440
>> iommu_probe_device+0xa4/0x180
>> iommu_bus_notifier+0x2d/0x40
>> notifier_call_chain+0x31/0x90
>> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3a/0x50
>> device_add+0x3c1/0x900
>> pci_device_add+0x255/0x580
>> pci_scan_single_device+0xa6/0xd0
>> pci_scan_slot+0x7a/0x1b0
>> pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x35/0x2a0
>> vmd_probe+0x5cd/0x970
>> pci_device_probe+0x95/0x110
>> really_probe+0xd6/0x350
>> __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x170
>> driver_probe_device+0x1a/0x90
>> __driver_attach+0xbc/0x190
>> bus_for_each_dev+0x72/0xc0
>> bus_add_driver+0x1bb/0x210
>> driver_register+0x66/0xc0
>> do_one_initcall+0x53/0x2f0
>> kernel_init_freeable+0x18f/0x1e1
>> kernel_init+0x11/0x120
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> -> #0 (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}:
>> validate_chain+0xb3f/0x2000
>> __lock_acquire+0x5a4/0xb70
>> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
>> down_read+0x39/0x140
>> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x50
>> device_add+0x3c1/0x900
>> platform_device_add+0x108/0x240
>> coretemp_cpu_online+0xe1/0x15e [coretemp]
>> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x181/0x8a0
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x188/0x1f0
>> smpboot_thread_fn+0x1b5/0x260
>> kthread+0xed/0x120
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> other info that might help us debug thi
>> Chain exists of &(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem -->
>> cpu_hotplug_lock --> cpuhp_state-
>> Possible unsafe locking scenari
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> ---- ----
>> lock(cpuhp_state-up);
>> lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
>> lock(cpuhp_state-up);
>> lock(&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem);
>> *** DEADLOCK *
>> 2 locks held by cpuhp/0/15:
>> #0: ffffffff82648f10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at:
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x48/0x1f0
>> #1: ffffffff826490c0 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x48/0x1f0
>> stack backtrace:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: cpuhp/0 Not tainted
>> 6.0.0-rc5-CI_DRM_12132-g6c93e979e542+ #1
>> Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client
>> Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS ADLPFWI1.R00.3135.A00.2203251419
>> 03/25/2022
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x7f
>> check_noncircular+0x132/0x150
>> validate_chain+0xb3f/0x2000
>> __lock_acquire+0x5a4/0xb70
>> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x310
>> ? blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x50
>> down_read+0x39/0x140
>> ? blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x50
>> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x50
>> device_add+0x3c1/0x900
>> ? dev_set_name+0x4e/0x70
>> platform_device_add+0x108/0x240
>> coretemp_cpu_online+0xe1/0x15e [coretemp]
>> ? create_core_data+0x550/0x550 [coretemp]
>> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x181/0x8a0
>> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x188/0x1f0
>> ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x1e/0x260
>> smpboot_thread_fn+0x1b5/0x260
>> ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
>> kthread+0xed/0x120
>> ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> </TASK>
>>
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6641
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolina.drobnik at intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 17 ++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> index 17dd683b2fce..9616b473e4c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
>> @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
>>
>> /* Domain for flush queue callback; NULL if flush queue not in use */
>> struct iommu_domain *fq_domain;
>> - struct mutex mutex;
>> };
>>
>> static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(iommu_deferred_attach_enabled);
>> @@ -312,7 +311,6 @@ int iommu_get_dma_cookie(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>> if (!domain->iova_cookie)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - mutex_init(&domain->iova_cookie->mutex);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -563,33 +561,26 @@ static int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct
>> iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
>> }
>>
>> /* start_pfn is always nonzero for an already-initialised domain */
>> - mutex_lock(&cookie->mutex);
>> if (iovad->start_pfn) {
>> if (1UL << order != iovad->granule ||
>> base_pfn != iovad->start_pfn) {
>> pr_warn("Incompatible range for DMA domain\n");
>> - ret = -EFAULT;
>> - goto done_unlock;
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = 0;
>> - goto done_unlock;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> init_iova_domain(iovad, 1UL << order, base_pfn);
>> ret = iova_domain_init_rcaches(iovad);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto done_unlock;
>> + return ret;
>>
>> /* If the FQ fails we can simply fall back to strict mode */
>> if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ && iommu_dma_init_fq(domain))
>> domain->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
>>
>> - ret = iova_reserve_iommu_regions(dev, domain);
>> -
>> -done_unlock:
>> - mutex_unlock(&cookie->mutex);
>> - return ret;
>> + return iova_reserve_iommu_regions(dev, domain);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list