[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Sep 21 07:56:38 UTC 2022


On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:29:55AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> > 
> > On 9/8/2022 5:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> > >> Hi Ville,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I fixed a similar issue in DII but I couldn't reproduce it in drm
> > >>
> > >> http://intel-gfx-pw.fi.intel.com/patch/228850/?series=15910&rev=2.
> > >>
> > >> I wonder if that fixes the problem you are facing then I can send that
> > >> to drm.
> > > CI can tell you. It has been complaining about this for ages
> > 
> > 
> > Could you please share a url/failed test name. I must be searching the 
> > wrong hw/test(https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-ivb-3770.html).
> 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12102/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
> 
> gen3 hits it nearly 100% of the time in the live selftests.
> IIRC it also looked like shard-snb has also hit it more
> sporadically in some tests.
> 
> There's also at least one bug about it
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4528
> which I guess is why ci is able to ignore this, and that
> then has enabled all the humans to ignore it as well.

Did we get anywhere with this? I'm getting tired of 
seeing the red in CI.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list