[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Fix PSR_IMR/IIR field handling
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Wed Sep 21 13:52:12 UTC 2022
On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 09:24 +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Current PSR code is assuming TRANSCODER_EDP == 0. This is not the case
> and all fields in PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR are shifted incorrectly if
> DISPLAY_VER >= 12.
There is no EDP transcoder in display 12 and newer.
>
> Fix this by using TRANSCODER_EDP definition instead of 0.
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 9def8d9fade6..9ecf1a9a1120 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void psr_irq_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> * 0 shift in bit definition
> */
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> - trans_shift = 0;
> + trans_shift = TRANSCODER_EDP;
> imr_reg = TRANS_PSR_IMR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
> } else {
> trans_shift = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 psr_iir)
> i915_reg_t imr_reg;
>
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> - trans_shift = 0;
> + trans_shift = TRANSCODER_EDP;
> imr_reg = TRANS_PSR_IMR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
> } else {
> trans_shift = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ static bool psr_interrupt_error_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> val = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> TRANS_PSR_IIR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder));
> - val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(0);
> + val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(TRANSCODER_EDP);
> } else {
> val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_IIR);
> val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list