[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/psr: Fix PSR_IMR/IIR field handling

Souza, Jose jose.souza at intel.com
Fri Sep 23 12:37:39 UTC 2022


On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 06:11 +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 13:08 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 10:59 +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > > Current PSR code is supposed to use TRANSCODER_EDP to force 0 shift
> > > for
> > > bits in PSR_IMR/IIR registers:
> > > 
> > > /*
> > >  * gen12+ has registers relative to transcoder and one per
> > > transcoder
> > >  * using the same bit definition: handle it as TRANSCODER_EDP to
> > > force
> > >  * 0 shift in bit definition
> > >  */
> > > 
> > > At the time of writing the code assumption "TRANSCODER_EDP == 0"
> > > was made.
> > > This is not the case and all fields in PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR are
> > > shifted
> > > incorrectly if DISPLAY_VER >= 12.
> > 
> > From where are you getting that TRANSCODER_EDP == 0?
> 
> It's not. That is my point. If you look at this commit:
> 
> https://github.com/freedesktop/drm-tip/commit/8241cfbe67f4082eee5fc72e5a8025c5b58c2ddf
> 
> adding this comment:
> 
> +       /*
> +        * gen12+ has registers relative to transcoder and one per
> transcoder
> +        * using the same bit definition: handle it as TRANSCODER_EDP
> to force
> +        * 0 shift in bit definition
> +        */
> 
> and the code added by this commit is doing
> 
> ...
> +               trans_shift = 0;
> mask = EDP_PSR_ERROR(trans_shift);
> ...
> 
> +       mask = EDP_PSR_ERROR(trans_shift);
> ...
> 
> and if we look at EDP_PSR_ERROR definition:
> 
> ...
> #define   _EDP_PSR_TRANS_SHIFT(trans)		((trans) ==
> TRANSCODER_EDP ? \
> 						 0 : ((trans) -
> TRANSCODER_A + 1) * 8)
> ...
> #define   EDP_PSR_ERROR(trans)			(0x4 <<
> _EDP_PSR_TRANS_SHIFT(trans))
> ...
> 
> EDP_PSR_ERROR(0) is 0x400 which is wrong for e.g. TGL. Using
> TRANSCODER_EDP as mentioned in the added comment:
> EDP_PSR_ERROR(TRANSCODER_EDP) is 0x4 which is correct.
> 
> My patch is doing what is in the comment. There are other way to fix
> this, but to my opinion original idea using TRANSCODER_EDP in commit 
> 8241cfbe67f4082eee5fc72e5a8025c5b58c2ddf to force 0 shift keeps the
> code pretty clean.
> 
> > 
> > enum pipe {
> >         INVALID_PIPE = -1,
> > 
> >         PIPE_A = 0,
> >         PIPE_B,
> >         PIPE_C,
> >         PIPE_D,
> >         _PIPE_EDP,
> > 
> >         I915_MAX_PIPES = _PIPE_EDP
> > };
> > 
> > #define pipe_name(p) ((p) + 'A')
> > 
> > enum transcoder {
> >         INVALID_TRANSCODER = -1,
> >         /*
> >          * The following transcoders have a 1:1 transcoder -> pipe
> > mapping,
> >          * keep their values fixed: the code assumes that
> > TRANSCODER_A=0, the
> >          * rest have consecutive values and match the enum values of
> > the pipes
> >          * they map to.EDP_PSR_TRANS_
> >          */
> >         TRANSCODER_A = PIPE_A,
> >         TRANSCODER_B = PIPE_B,
> >         TRANSCODER_C = PIPE_C,
> >         TRANSCODER_D = PIPE_D,
> > 
> >         /*
> >          * The following transcoders can map to any pipe, their enum
> > value
> >          * doesn't need to stay fixed.
> >          */
> >         TRANSCODER_EDP,
> > 
> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h#n87
> > 
> > > 
> > > Fix this by using TRANSCODER_EDP definition instead of 0. Even
> > > thought
> > > TRANSCODER_EDP doesn't exist in display_ver >= 12 doing it this way
> > > keeps
> > > code clean and readable.
> > 
> > trans_shift = 0 is fine, we needed this because display12+ splited
> > from a single register with all transcoder to one register per
> > transcoder.
> > 
> 
> No, it's not. See the definition of  _EDP_PSR_TRANS_SHIFT and
> EDP_PSR_TRANS_*. Maybe renaming trans_shift to transcoder would prevent
> misunderstanding here.

Okay now I understood.
In my opinion the proper fix would be add TGL_X macros to be used in diplay12+ paths and drop the EDP transcoder concept that do not exist in TGL+.

Also please include a fixes tag pointing to 8241cfbe67f4082eee5fc72e5a8025c5b58c2ddf so this gets backported.

> 
> > > 
> > > v2: Improve commit message (José)
> > > 
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > index 9def8d9fade6..9ecf1a9a1120 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void psr_irq_control(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >          * 0 shift in bit definition
> > >          */
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > > -               trans_shift = 0;
> > > +               trans_shift = TRANSCODER_EDP;
> > >                 imr_reg = TRANS_PSR_IMR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
> > >         } else {
> > >                 trans_shift = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> > > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp, u32 psr_iir)
> > >         i915_reg_t imr_reg;
> > >  
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > > -               trans_shift = 0;
> > > +               trans_shift = TRANSCODER_EDP;
> > >                 imr_reg = TRANS_PSR_IMR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
> > >         } else {
> > >                 trans_shift = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> > > @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ static bool psr_interrupt_error_check(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > >                 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> > >                                     TRANS_PSR_IIR(intel_dp-
> > > > psr.transcoder));
> > > -               val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(0);
> > > +               val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(TRANSCODER_EDP);
> > >         } else {
> > >                 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_IIR);
> > >                 val &= EDP_PSR_ERROR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
> > 
> 



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list