[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/33] drm/modes: Add a function to generate analog display modes
Maxime Ripard
maxime at cerno.tech
Mon Sep 26 10:18:49 UTC 2022
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 23.09.22 um 11:18 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
> > > Am 22.09.22 um 16:25 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > > > + drm_dbg_kms(dev,
> > > > + "Generating a %ux%u%c, %u-line mode with a %lu kHz clock\n",
> > > > + hactive, vactive,
> > > > + interlace ? 'i' : 'p',
> > > > + params->num_lines,
> > > > + pixel_clock_hz / 1000);
> > >
> > > Divide by HZ_PER_KHZ here and in other places.
> > >
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/units.h#L23
> >
> > From the Department of Bikeshedding:
> >
> > I find "pixel_clock_hz / 1000" has much more clarity than
> > "pixel_clock_hz / HZ_PER_KHZ".
>
> This one's easy to see because it tells you with the _hz postfix. Many
> places don't and then it quickly gets confusing what units the code's
> converting.
So if I add it to places that don't have it explicitly (ie, tests) would
that be acceptable to both of you?
Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20220926/52ef95e8/attachment.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list