[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest live_slpc_power
Belgaumkar, Vinay
vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Mon Sep 26 16:04:51 UTC 2022
On 9/23/2022 4:00 AM, Riana Tauro wrote:
> A fundamental assumption is that at lower frequencies,
> not only do we run slower, but we save power compared to
> higher frequencies.
> live_slpc_power checks if running at low frequency saves power
>
> v2: re-use code to measure power
> fixed cosmetic review comments (Vinay)
>
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro at intel.com>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> index 928f74718881..4c6e9257e593 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
> enum test_type {
> VARY_MIN,
> VARY_MAX,
> - MAX_GRANTED
> + MAX_GRANTED,
> + SLPC_POWER,
> };
>
> static int slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
> @@ -41,6 +42,39 @@ static int slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int slpc_set_freq(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 freq)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc;
> +
> + err = slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, freq);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("Unable to update max freq");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, freq);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("Unable to update min freq");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static u64 measure_power_at_freq(struct intel_gt *gt, int *freq, u64 *power)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + err = slpc_set_freq(gt, *freq);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + *freq = intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(>->rps);
> + *power = measure_power(>->rps, freq);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int vary_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps *rps,
> u32 *max_act_freq)
> {
> @@ -113,6 +147,58 @@ static int vary_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps *rps,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int slpc_power(struct intel_gt *gt, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = >->uc.guc.slpc;
> + struct {
> + u64 power;
> + int freq;
> + } min, max;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Our fundamental assumption is that running at lower frequency
> + * actually saves power. Let's see if our RAPL measurement supports
> + * that theory.
> + */
> + if (!librapl_supported(gt->i915))
> + return 0;
> +
> + min.freq = slpc->min_freq;
> + err = measure_power_at_freq(gt, &min.freq, &min.power);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + max.freq = slpc->rp0_freq;
> + err = measure_power_at_freq(gt, &max.freq, &max.power);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + pr_info("%s: min:%llumW @ %uMHz, max:%llumW @ %uMHz\n",
> + engine->name,
> + min.power, min.freq,
> + max.power, max.freq);
> +
> + if (10 * min.freq >= 9 * max.freq) {
> + pr_notice("Could not control frequency, ran at [%uMHz, %uMhz]\n",
> + min.freq, max.freq);
> + }
> +
> + if (11 * min.power > 10 * max.power) {
> + pr_err("%s: did not conserve power when setting lower frequency!\n",
> + engine->name);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Restore min/max frequencies */
> + slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, slpc->rp0_freq);
> + slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, slpc->min_freq);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int max_granted_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct intel_rps *rps, u32 *max_act_freq)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
> @@ -233,17 +319,23 @@ static int run_test(struct intel_gt *gt, int test_type)
>
> err = max_granted_freq(slpc, rps, &max_act_freq);
> break;
> +
> + case SLPC_POWER:
> + err = slpc_power(gt, engine);
> + break;
> }
>
> - pr_info("Max actual frequency for %s was %d\n",
> - engine->name, max_act_freq);
> + if (test_type != SLPC_POWER) {
> + pr_info("Max actual frequency for %s was %d\n",
> + engine->name, max_act_freq);
>
> - /* Actual frequency should rise above min */
> - if (max_act_freq <= slpc_min_freq) {
> - pr_err("Actual freq did not rise above min\n");
> - pr_err("Perf Limit Reasons: 0x%x\n",
> - intel_uncore_read(gt->uncore, GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS));
> - err = -EINVAL;
> + /* Actual frequency should rise above min */
> + if (max_act_freq <= slpc_min_freq) {
> + pr_err("Actual freq did not rise above min\n");
> + pr_err("Perf Limit Reasons: 0x%x\n",
> + intel_uncore_read(gt->uncore, GT0_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS));
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> @@ -316,12 +408,29 @@ static int live_slpc_max_granted(void *arg)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int live_slpc_power(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> + struct intel_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
> + ret = run_test(gt, SLPC_POWER);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int intel_slpc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> SUBTEST(live_slpc_vary_max),
> SUBTEST(live_slpc_vary_min),
> SUBTEST(live_slpc_max_granted),
> + SUBTEST(live_slpc_power),
> };
>
> struct intel_gt *gt;
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list