[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step

[Srivatsa, Anusha]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:30 AM
> To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Shankar, Uma
> <uma.shankar at intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>; Navare,
> Manasi D <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step
> 
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:21:40PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 12:04 PM
> > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Shankar, Uma
> > > <uma.shankar at intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>;
> > > Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> > > <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:56:53PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:59 PM
> > > > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Shankar, Uma
> > > > > <uma.shankar at intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:48:46PM +0000, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:20 AM
> > > > > > > To: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > > > > > > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Shankar, Uma
> > > > > > > <uma.shankar at intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> > > > > > > <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce struct cdclk_step
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:43:58PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> > > > > > > > This is a prep series for the actual cdclk refactoring
> > > > > > > > that will be sent following this. Idea is to have a struct
> > > > > > > > - cdclk_step that holds the following:
> > > > > > > > - cdclk action (squash, crawl or modeset)
> > > > > > > > - cdclk frequency
> > > > > > > > which gets populated in atomic check. Driver uses the
> > > > > > > > populated values during atomic commit to do the suitable
> > > > > > > > sequence of actions like programming squash ctl registers
> > > > > > > > in case of squashing or PLL sequence incase of modeset and so
> on.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This series just addresses the initial idea. The actual
> > > > > > > > plumming in the atomic commit phase will be sent shortly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK, people keep ignoring what I say so I just typed up the
> > > > > > > code quickly. This to me seems like the most straightforward
> > > > > > > way to do what
> > > > > we need:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/vsyrjala/linux.git cdclk_crawl_and_squash
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Totally untested ofc, apart from me doing a quick scan
> > > > > > > through our cdclk tables for the crawl+squahs platforms to
> > > > > > > make sure that this approach should produce sane values.
> > > > > > Ville,
> > > > > > Why have a mid cdclk_config? Cant we use the new-cdclk-config
> > > > > > for this
> > > > > purpose?
> > > > >
> > > > > You either
> > > > > - start at old, crawl to mid, then squash to new
> > > > > - start at old, squash to mid, then crawl to new
> > > >
> > > > Tested the changes on TGL(legacy) and DG2(squash). Took some time
> > > > to
> > > understand the code but the mid cdclk config logic works. @Ville
> > > Syrjälä does replacing the intel_cdclk_can_squash() and
> > > intel_cdclk_can_crawl() with your new cdclk_crawl_and_squash in atomic
> check make sense?
> > >
> > > I don't think we should need any real logic at that point.
> > > If we can squash and crawl then I think we can always do the cdclk
> > > change w/o a modeset, at least with what we currently have defined
> > > in the cdclk tables.
> >
> > @Ville Syrjälä is this patch in your radar to be sending out to the ML? Or
> should I send it on your behalf?
> 
> You can take over again if you want.

Will do. Thanks Ville!

Anusha
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel