[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] overflow: Introduce overflows_type() and castable_to_type()

[Nick Desaulniers]

+ Arnd

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:11 PM Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
> ---
> v2:
>  - fix comment typo
>  - wrap clang pragma to avoid GCC warnings
>  - style nit cleanups
>  - rename __castable_to_type() to castable_to_type()
>  - remove prior overflows_type() definition
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220926003743.409911-1-keescook@chromium.org
> diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> index f385ca652b74..fffc3f86181d 100644
> --- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>
> +/* We're expecting to do a lot of "always true" or "always false" tests. */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare"
> +#endif

Any chance we can reuse parts of __diag_ignore or __diag_clang from
include/linux/compiler_types.h or include/linux/compiler-clang.h
respectively?

Those are needed for pragmas within preprocessor macros, which we
don't have here, but I suspect they may be more concise to use here.

> +#define TEST_SAME_TYPE(t1, t2, same)                   do {    \
> +       typeof(t1) __t1h = type_max(t1);                        \
> +       typeof(t1) __t1l = type_min(t1);                        \
> +       typeof(t2) __t2h = type_max(t2);                        \
> +       typeof(t2) __t2l = type_min(t2);                        \

Can we use __auto_type here rather than typeof(macro expansion)?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers